Big Food and Big Tobacco take the long view and so should advocates

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Earlier this month, I tuned into the webcast of the UCSF "It's About a Billion Lives" annual symposium to hear the latest from the tobacco control field. Even though I've heard amazing presentations by UCSF's scientists many times, I was riveted by what scholars Amanda Fallin & Rachel Grana had to say about the role of the tobacco industry in fomenting the Tea Party.

I've read stories before saying the Tea Party isn't the grassroots movement it claims. One of the more prominent involved the Tea Party Express, a bus tour meant to drum up Tea Party support. Led by a Sacramento-based lobbying group, it was widely criticized -- by many within the Tea Party as well as outsiders -- as nothing more than "astroturf," made to seem like grassroots activism but funded and supported by major corporations or wealthy donors. The infamous David Koch, of the Koch brothers, has been called the Tea Party's "wallet" for backing a variety of conservative causes around the country.

But I was blown away by what Fallin and Grana found in the tobacco industry documents. As early as the 1980s, the tobacco industry began working on a way to position smoking as a right that must be protected against governmental intrusion and foresaw how a national movement could support this campaign. In 1993, a PR consultant for Philip Morris offered an eerily prescient recommendation for what this campaign should entail:

"Grounded in the theme of 'The New American Tax Revolution' or 'The New Boston Tea Party,' the campaign should take the form of citizens representing the widest constituency base mobilized with signage and other attention-drawing accoutrements such as lapel buttons, handouts, petitions and even costumes."

Sound familiar?

The authors go on to detail the many ways in which the tobacco industry has been involved in fomenting the Tea Party, including being a "quarterback behind the scenes," and supporting "third-party efforts," such as Citizens for a Sound Economy, an organization founded in 1984 by the Koch brothers that has spawned various Tea Party groups still active today.

No surprise then that the paper (payment required for non-subscribers), has spurred quite a bit of media attention, including some notable pushback. Fox News' spin on the story offers a criticism right out of the tobacco-Tea Party playbook. Fox calls the research "an attractive narrative for Tea Party critics," quoting a Tea Party Patriot co-founder saying, "It's an example of the frivolous spending inside the government that has landed us $17 trillion in debt" -- a critique that echoes criticism of government found in the tobacco industry documents. Most news coverage, however, has shared my shock at how long ago the tobacco industry began its deep involvement with this cause.

Corporate influence in politics is not merely about the Tea Party but about how corporations can undermine effective actions to create a healthier society. For example, right now the FDA's lack of meaningful action on tobacco products is calling into question whether the agency is a public health ally in the fight against the damage caused by the industry's products.

And this issue isn't just limited to Big Tobacco. An abundance of recent evidence points to the food & beverage and alcohol industries using many of these same tactics -- such as strategic donations to public health and civil rights organizations, and stalling governmental action -- to similar effect.

As I listened to Fallin and Grana describe Big Tobacco's Tea Party exploits, it reminded me how good the industry is at playing the long game -- it is able to see potential threats coming well before they manifest, and it is excellent at planning counter strategies. We found that soda companies are up to the same thing when they use corporate social responsibility campaigns to market themselves as part of the solution to obesity. Pepsi, for example, figured out that young people attach major significance to brands perceived to "do good" in the world and used its Refresh Everything campaign as a means to create long-lasting brand loyalties with these consumers.

Whether it's junk foods, alcohol or tobacco, industry has shown time and again that it plans far in advance. Those committed to improving health need to remember this and be ready for a sustained effort to change harmful corporate practices and achieve our health goals.

chronic disease (2) personal responsibility (3) collaboration (1) SB 402 (1) sexual health (1) Bill Cosby (1) Aurora (1) Bloomberg (3) Gardasil (1) Black Lives Matter (1) food industry (4) food justice (1) Twitter (1) corporate social responsibility (1) marketing (1) El Monte (3) Chile (1) Dora the Explorer (1) Penn State (3) Texas (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) Whiteclay (4) gender (1) tobacco (5) violence prevention (8) Let's Move (1) journalism (1) San Francisco (3) food deserts (1) diabetes prevention (1) reproductive justice (1) campaign finance (1) Richmond (5) beauty products (1) junk food marketing (4) front groups (1) industry appeals to choice (1) Oglala Sioux (3) Sam Kass (1) soda tax (11) paper tigers (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) autism (1) democracy (1) media analysis (6) communication strategy (1) elephant triggers (1) education (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) prison phone calls (1) Amanda Fallin (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) new year's resolutions (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) weight of the nation (1) Michelle Obama (1) structural racism (1) ACEs (2) indoor smoking ban (1) values (1) Big Soda (2) violence (2) california (1) ssb (1) cannes lions festival (1) public health policy (2) race (1) mental health (2) water security (1) social change (1) childhood obesity (1) news (2) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) tobacco industry (2) McDonald's (1) food (1) sandusky (2) regulation (2) prevention (1) food swamps (1) health care (1) gatorade bolt game (1) news strategy (1) Newtown (1) sugary drinks (10) Oakland Unified School District (1) food and beverage marketing (3) Berkeley (2) vaccines (1) breastfeeding (3) PepsiCo (1) food marketing (5) social justice (2) gun violence (1) Merck (1) American Beverage Association (1) food environment (1) online marketing (1) Connecticut shooting (1) liana winett (1) soda warning labels (1) privilege (1) suicide barrier (2) community organizing (1) auto safety (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) cosmetics (1) Donald Trump (2) water (1) soda taxes (2) Catholic church (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) Happy Meals (1) built environment (2) tobacco control (2) Johnson & Johnson (1) strategic communication (1) media (7) physical activity (1) measure N (2) gun control (2) food access (1) paula deen (1) media bites (1) naacp (1) cervical cancer (1) Measure O (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) Joe Paterno (1) Marion Nestle (1) authentic voices (1) health equity (10) emergency contraception (1) youth (1) stigma (1) communication (2) news coverage (1) environmental health (1) sanitation (1) election 2016 (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) institutional accountability (1) prison system (1) Big Tobacco (3) HPV vaccine (1) Proposition 47 (1) apha (3) language (6) community safety (1) george lakoff (1) SB-5 (1) digital marketing (3) child sexual abuse (5) summer camps (1) advocacy (3) racism (1) Rachel Grana (1) genital warts (1) political correctness (1) community (1) cap the tap (1) safety (1) seat belt laws (1) cigarette advertising (1) obesity prevention (1) beverage industry (2) diabetes (1) soda (12) nanny state (2) SSBs (1) abortion (1) Wendy Davis (1) Nickelodeon (1) Sandy Hook (2) messaging (3) alcohol (5) default frame (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) inequities (1) public health (71) white house (1) equity (3) Telluride (1) nonprofit communications (1) healthy eating (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) Big Food (2) community violence (1) news analysis (3) cancer prevention (1) sports drinks (1) target marketing (9) suicide nets (1) government intrusion (1) framing (14) world water day (1) snap (1) Proposition 29 (1) sexual violence (2) FCC (1) Citizens United (1) Tea Party (1) SB 1000 (1) junk food (2) sexual assault (1) soda industry (4) social math (1) media advocacy (23) Jerry Sandusky (3) suicide prevention (2) tobacco tax (1) community health (1) obesity (10) sexism (2) choice (1) childhood adversity (1) public health data (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) Colorado (1) news monitoring (1) women's health (2) children's health (3) childhood trauma (3) filibuster (1) product safety (1) cancer research (1) social media (2) Coca-Cola (3)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: