Leaked Coca-Cola emails reveal an opportunity for advocates

printer friendlyprinter friendly

With document leaks coming at us left and right, one particular leak that has healthy food and drink advocates buzzing is the recent release of hacked Coca-Cola emails that show the company's apparent growing concern about current soda tax proposals like the ones in San Francisco and Oakland.

The leaked internal emails released by the anonymous hacker site D.C. Leaks show how Coca-Cola is fighting soda taxes in the U.S. and abroad.

In the California cities of San Francisco, Oakland and Albany as well as Boulder, Colorado, Big Soda has spent big money to defeat soda tax proposals. Since 2014, when Berkeley became the first city in the country to approve a soda tax measure — and the Navajo Nation Council approved a 2 percent sales tax on sweetened beverages and junk food on top of a 5 percent sales tax for foods of minimal to no nutritional value — the soda industry has more than doubled its spending on lobbying and campaigning against soda tax proposals, from $14 million to $37.7 million, according to Vox.com.

The leaked emails show just how aggressively Big Soda continues to fight legislation in the U.S. and abroad. In addition to the California and Colorado measures, Coca-Cola targeted two soda tax proposals in Connecticut and in West Virginia, according to a recent MarketWatch story. The report also excerpted internal emails that characterized a soda-tax proposal in France as "worrying."

Most noteworthy was a classified leaked document from Coca-Cola Europe that included a "public policy risk matrix & lobby focus" that placed marketing and advertising restrictions high on "business impact" but low on "likelihood to materialize."

coca-cola matrix
Click on image to enlarge

And, according to a follow-up MarketWatch story, "the leaked emails show how Coca-Cola has actively and successfully lobbied against legislation in multiple countries that would have prevented it from advertising to kids."

Sounds like we advocates have our marching orders. It's our job, along with our partners and allies, to make advertising restrictions to children waaaay more likely.


Dora the Explorer (1) American Beverage Association (1) communication (2) corporate social responsibility (1) george lakoff (1) violence prevention (8) digital marketing (3) Michelle Obama (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) Joe Paterno (1) junk food marketing (4) tobacco (5) Penn State (3) Johnson & Johnson (1) Proposition 29 (1) San Francisco (3) health equity (10) McDonald's (1) suicide barrier (2) auto safety (1) suicide nets (1) emergency contraception (1) Donald Trump (2) cigarette advertising (1) target marketing (9) food justice (1) cosmetics (1) Let's Move (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) food deserts (1) Chile (1) Big Food (2) weight of the nation (1) chronic disease (2) environmental health (1) gender (1) vaccines (1) default frame (1) community (1) paula deen (1) stigma (1) SSBs (1) children's health (3) white house (1) cervical cancer (1) social math (1) physical activity (1) Aurora (1) Richmond (5) Colorado (1) tobacco control (2) obesity prevention (1) naacp (1) privilege (1) news analysis (3) Twitter (1) elephant triggers (1) Catholic church (1) safety (1) childhood trauma (3) Whiteclay (4) food environment (1) regulation (2) water security (1) news coverage (1) women's health (2) community violence (1) values (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) framing (14) inequities (1) Black Lives Matter (1) california (1) marketing (1) industry appeals to choice (1) food swamps (1) cancer research (1) Nickelodeon (1) mental health (2) soda taxes (2) food marketing (5) gun control (2) obesity (10) news strategy (1) diabetes prevention (1) PepsiCo (1) media advocacy (23) food (1) childhood adversity (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) sexual assault (1) world water day (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) Amanda Fallin (1) online marketing (1) structural racism (1) institutional accountability (1) public health policy (2) diabetes (1) Newtown (1) sugary drinks (10) beverage industry (2) reproductive justice (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) news monitoring (1) filibuster (1) youth (1) education (1) Big Soda (2) healthy eating (1) sandusky (2) collaboration (1) media analysis (6) public health data (1) child sexual abuse (5) gun violence (1) summer camps (1) social justice (2) junk food marketing to kids (2) El Monte (3) social media (2) democracy (1) race (1) new year's resolutions (1) authentic voices (1) messaging (3) community health (1) prison phone calls (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) journalism (1) product safety (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) indoor smoking ban (1) seat belt laws (1) Rachel Grana (1) Connecticut shooting (1) beauty products (1) racism (1) Sandy Hook (2) campaign finance (1) Bloomberg (3) media (7) liana winett (1) measure N (2) SB-5 (1) food industry (4) sports drinks (1) social change (1) sexual violence (2) water (1) prevention (1) breastfeeding (3) Oglala Sioux (3) government intrusion (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) suicide prevention (2) election 2016 (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) SB 1000 (1) childhood obesity (1) public health (71) gatorade bolt game (1) cannes lions festival (1) Texas (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) nanny state (2) HPV vaccine (1) violence (2) front groups (1) language (6) tobacco industry (2) sexual health (1) Wendy Davis (1) nonprofit communications (1) ssb (1) community safety (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) soda (12) Happy Meals (1) snap (1) autism (1) Measure O (1) advocacy (3) junk food (2) food access (1) prison system (1) paper tigers (1) cap the tap (1) Telluride (1) genital warts (1) apha (3) Sam Kass (1) equity (3) food and beverage marketing (3) sanitation (1) news (2) abortion (1) Gardasil (1) built environment (2) Tea Party (1) personal responsibility (3) communication strategy (1) Berkeley (2) choice (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) FCC (1) Citizens United (1) alcohol (5) Bill Cosby (1) ACEs (2) soda warning labels (1) sexism (2) health care (1) strategic communication (1) community organizing (1) SB 402 (1) Coca-Cola (3) soda tax (11) Proposition 47 (1) political correctness (1) Merck (1) soda industry (4) media bites (1) cancer prevention (1) tobacco tax (1) Big Tobacco (3) Marion Nestle (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: