Leaked Coca-Cola emails reveal an opportunity for advocates

printer friendlyprinter friendly

With document leaks coming at us left and right, one particular leak that has healthy food and drink advocates buzzing is the recent release of hacked Coca-Cola emails that show the company's apparent growing concern about current soda tax proposals like the ones in San Francisco and Oakland.

The leaked internal emails released by the anonymous hacker site D.C. Leaks show how Coca-Cola is fighting soda taxes in the U.S. and abroad.

In the California cities of San Francisco, Oakland and Albany as well as Boulder, Colorado, Big Soda has spent big money to defeat soda tax proposals. Since 2014, when Berkeley became the first city in the country to approve a soda tax measure — and the Navajo Nation Council approved a 2 percent sales tax on sweetened beverages and junk food on top of a 5 percent sales tax for foods of minimal to no nutritional value — the soda industry has more than doubled its spending on lobbying and campaigning against soda tax proposals, from $14 million to $37.7 million, according to Vox.com.

The leaked emails show just how aggressively Big Soda continues to fight legislation in the U.S. and abroad. In addition to the California and Colorado measures, Coca-Cola targeted two soda tax proposals in Connecticut and in West Virginia, according to a recent MarketWatch story. The report also excerpted internal emails that characterized a soda-tax proposal in France as "worrying."

Most noteworthy was a classified leaked document from Coca-Cola Europe that included a "public policy risk matrix & lobby focus" that placed marketing and advertising restrictions high on "business impact" but low on "likelihood to materialize."

coca-cola matrix
Click on image to enlarge

And, according to a follow-up MarketWatch story, "the leaked emails show how Coca-Cola has actively and successfully lobbied against legislation in multiple countries that would have prevented it from advertising to kids."

Sounds like we advocates have our marching orders. It's our job, along with our partners and allies, to make advertising restrictions to children waaaay more likely.


cancer prevention (1) world water day (1) women's health (2) media bites (1) food justice (1) cosmetics (1) seat belt laws (1) Bill Cosby (1) autism (1) emergency contraception (1) soda taxes (2) public health (70) soda industry (4) Measure O (1) industry appeals to choice (1) healthy eating (1) Let's Move (1) sexual assault (1) paper tigers (1) beauty products (1) water (1) advocacy (3) Telluride (1) Michelle Obama (1) news monitoring (1) tobacco industry (2) privilege (1) filibuster (1) corporate social responsibility (1) george lakoff (1) Coca-Cola (3) election 2016 (1) McDonald's (1) online marketing (1) physical activity (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) product safety (1) measure N (2) default frame (1) education (1) Tea Party (1) prison system (1) junk food marketing (4) authentic voices (1) health care (1) youth (1) children's health (3) SB-5 (1) community organizing (1) Richmond (5) Rachel Grana (1) news coverage (1) social media (2) violence prevention (8) Golden Gate Bridge (2) framing (14) sanitation (1) diabetes prevention (1) ssb (1) Chile (1) Colorado (1) diabetes (1) community violence (1) community safety (1) nonprofit communications (1) beverage industry (2) sexism (2) tobacco tax (1) health equity (10) adverse childhood experiences (3) Citizens United (1) liana winett (1) media analysis (6) childhood adversity (1) Connecticut shooting (1) cigarette advertising (1) gun violence (1) democracy (1) breastfeeding (3) soda tax (11) gatorade bolt game (1) food and beverage marketing (3) digital marketing (2) food deserts (1) california (1) water security (1) sexual violence (2) cannes lions festival (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) political correctness (1) Amanda Fallin (1) stigma (1) social justice (2) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) safety (1) auto safety (1) nanny state (2) community health (1) news (2) inequities (1) Joe Paterno (1) child sexual abuse (5) food (1) sports drinks (1) Berkeley (2) Gardasil (1) public health data (1) Oglala Sioux (3) social math (1) elephant triggers (1) Whiteclay (4) Sandy Hook (2) sandusky (2) environmental health (1) suicide prevention (2) Catholic church (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) food marketing (4) race (1) news analysis (3) American Beverage Association (1) naacp (1) prison phone calls (1) messaging (3) Twitter for advocacy (1) paula deen (1) PepsiCo (1) SB 1000 (1) racism (1) communication (2) collaboration (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) gender (1) FCC (1) campaign finance (1) Nickelodeon (1) obesity prevention (1) food industry (4) personal responsibility (3) Sam Kass (1) Donald Trump (2) Twitter (1) built environment (2) chronic disease (2) soda warning labels (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) Merck (1) cancer research (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) Black Lives Matter (1) SB 402 (1) regulation (2) mental health (2) childhood trauma (3) Dora the Explorer (1) sexual health (1) Proposition 29 (1) Bloomberg (3) apha (3) social change (1) violence (2) marketing (1) communication strategy (1) genital warts (1) journalism (1) suicide barrier (2) cap the tap (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) El Monte (3) HPV vaccine (1) media (7) SSBs (1) suicide nets (1) community (1) San Francisco (3) equity (3) reproductive justice (1) junk food (2) vaccines (1) Newtown (1) media advocacy (23) new year's resolutions (1) prevention (1) choice (1) snap (1) food swamps (1) summer camps (1) Big Tobacco (3) weight of the nation (1) tobacco (5) junk food marketing to kids (2) values (1) news strategy (1) government intrusion (1) ACEs (2) tobacco control (2) Texas (1) Marion Nestle (1) cervical cancer (1) language (6) Happy Meals (1) institutional accountability (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) obesity (10) food access (1) structural racism (1) Aurora (1) Big Soda (2) soda (12) Proposition 47 (1) childhood obesity (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) alcohol (5) white house (1) public health policy (2) target marketing (8) sugary drinks (10) Penn State (3) abortion (1) food environment (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) indoor smoking ban (1) gun control (2) Big Food (2) front groups (1) Wendy Davis (1) strategic communication (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: