Leaked Coca-Cola emails reveal an opportunity for advocates

printer friendlyprinter friendly

With document leaks coming at us left and right, one particular leak that has healthy food and drink advocates buzzing is the recent release of hacked Coca-Cola emails that show the company's apparent growing concern about current soda tax proposals like the ones in San Francisco and Oakland.

The leaked internal emails released by the anonymous hacker site D.C. Leaks show how Coca-Cola is fighting soda taxes in the U.S. and abroad.

In the California cities of San Francisco, Oakland and Albany as well as Boulder, Colorado, Big Soda has spent big money to defeat soda tax proposals. Since 2014, when Berkeley became the first city in the country to approve a soda tax measure — and the Navajo Nation Council approved a 2 percent sales tax on sweetened beverages and junk food on top of a 5 percent sales tax for foods of minimal to no nutritional value — the soda industry has more than doubled its spending on lobbying and campaigning against soda tax proposals, from $14 million to $37.7 million, according to Vox.com.

The leaked emails show just how aggressively Big Soda continues to fight legislation in the U.S. and abroad. In addition to the California and Colorado measures, Coca-Cola targeted two soda tax proposals in Connecticut and in West Virginia, according to a recent MarketWatch story. The report also excerpted internal emails that characterized a soda-tax proposal in France as "worrying."

Most noteworthy was a classified leaked document from Coca-Cola Europe that included a "public policy risk matrix & lobby focus" that placed marketing and advertising restrictions high on "business impact" but low on "likelihood to materialize."

coca-cola matrix
Click on image to enlarge

And, according to a follow-up MarketWatch story, "the leaked emails show how Coca-Cola has actively and successfully lobbied against legislation in multiple countries that would have prevented it from advertising to kids."

Sounds like we advocates have our marching orders. It's our job, along with our partners and allies, to make advertising restrictions to children waaaay more likely.


Golden Gate Bridge (2) political correctness (1) tobacco industry (2) sanitation (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) Berkeley (2) public health (68) community violence (1) media analysis (5) community (1) california (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) tobacco (5) youth (1) cervical cancer (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) tobacco tax (1) suicide barrier (2) privilege (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) naacp (1) inequities (1) Twitter (1) obesity prevention (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) elephant triggers (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) racism (1) SB 402 (1) alcohol (5) childhood adversity (1) values (1) food and beverage marketing (3) choice (1) SB 1000 (1) Bloomberg (3) regulation (2) cancer prevention (1) messaging (3) health care (1) Nickelodeon (1) food access (1) physical activity (1) sandusky (2) soda warning labels (1) junk food (2) suicide nets (1) Catholic church (1) Dora the Explorer (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) junk food marketing (4) language (6) ssb (1) FCC (1) Colorado (1) sports drinks (1) food swamps (1) Texas (1) Penn State (3) apha (2) Joe Paterno (1) liana winett (1) food environment (1) community health (1) gun control (2) Chile (1) suicide prevention (2) summer camps (1) social media (2) beauty products (1) community organizing (1) tobacco control (2) weight of the nation (1) gatorade bolt game (1) Wendy Davis (1) institutional accountability (1) food industry (4) personal responsibility (3) Marion Nestle (1) white house (1) government intrusion (1) world water day (1) Tea Party (1) corporate social responsibility (1) Aurora (1) Sandy Hook (2) collaboration (1) Sam Kass (1) Black Lives Matter (1) emergency contraception (1) violence prevention (8) seat belt laws (1) Whiteclay (4) media (7) Happy Meals (1) filibuster (1) diabetes (1) El Monte (3) Merck (1) structural racism (1) cap the tap (1) Rachel Grana (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) public health data (1) sexual violence (2) San Francisco (3) Citizens United (1) obesity (10) food justice (1) target marketing (8) industry appeals to choice (1) Big Food (2) chronic disease (2) equity (3) news monitoring (1) water security (1) sexism (2) childhood obestiy conference (1) news analysis (3) soda tax (11) Measure O (1) race (1) digital marketing (2) social justice (1) nonprofit communications (1) election 2016 (1) cosmetics (1) Gardasil (1) george lakoff (1) autism (1) health equity (10) Amanda Fallin (1) soda taxes (2) Connecticut shooting (1) default frame (1) gender (1) soda industry (4) authentic voices (1) food (1) breastfeeding (3) auto safety (1) children's health (3) social change (1) product safety (1) cigarette advertising (1) communication strategy (1) safety (1) water (1) sugary drinks (10) SB-5 (1) snap (1) social math (1) PepsiCo (1) prison system (1) new year's resolutions (1) built environment (2) Proposition 29 (1) genital warts (1) diabetes prevention (1) environmental health (1) media bites (1) community safety (1) healthy eating (1) media advocacy (22) education (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) cancer research (1) violence (2) McDonald's (1) American Beverage Association (1) news coverage (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) paper tigers (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) sexual health (1) marketing (1) Coca-Cola (3) public health policy (2) cannes lions festival (1) stigma (1) child sexual abuse (5) Big Tobacco (3) abortion (1) ACEs (2) Richmond (5) Donald Trump (2) childhood obesity (1) food marketing (4) HPV vaccine (1) soda (12) Michelle Obama (1) mental health (2) advocacy (3) online marketing (1) nanny state (2) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) reproductive justice (1) news (2) Let's Move (1) sexual assault (1) prevention (1) front groups (1) prison phone calls (1) SSBs (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) news strategy (1) childhood trauma (3) Newtown (1) indoor smoking ban (1) Big Soda (2) journalism (1) food deserts (1) women's health (2) Telluride (1) communication (2) Bill Cosby (1) framing (14) gun violence (1) beverage industry (2) campaign finance (1) vaccines (1) Proposition 47 (1) democracy (1) Oglala Sioux (3) paula deen (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) measure N (2)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: