Leaked Coca-Cola emails reveal an opportunity for advocates

printer friendlyprinter friendly

With document leaks coming at us left and right, one particular leak that has healthy food and drink advocates buzzing is the recent release of hacked Coca-Cola emails that show the company's apparent growing concern about current soda tax proposals like the ones in San Francisco and Oakland.

The leaked internal emails released by the anonymous hacker site D.C. Leaks show how Coca-Cola is fighting soda taxes in the U.S. and abroad.

In the California cities of San Francisco, Oakland and Albany as well as Boulder, Colorado, Big Soda has spent big money to defeat soda tax proposals. Since 2014, when Berkeley became the first city in the country to approve a soda tax measure — and the Navajo Nation Council approved a 2 percent sales tax on sweetened beverages and junk food on top of a 5 percent sales tax for foods of minimal to no nutritional value — the soda industry has more than doubled its spending on lobbying and campaigning against soda tax proposals, from $14 million to $37.7 million, according to Vox.com.

The leaked emails show just how aggressively Big Soda continues to fight legislation in the U.S. and abroad. In addition to the California and Colorado measures, Coca-Cola targeted two soda tax proposals in Connecticut and in West Virginia, according to a recent MarketWatch story. The report also excerpted internal emails that characterized a soda-tax proposal in France as "worrying."

Most noteworthy was a classified leaked document from Coca-Cola Europe that included a "public policy risk matrix & lobby focus" that placed marketing and advertising restrictions high on "business impact" but low on "likelihood to materialize."

coca-cola matrix
Click on image to enlarge

And, according to a follow-up MarketWatch story, "the leaked emails show how Coca-Cola has actively and successfully lobbied against legislation in multiple countries that would have prevented it from advertising to kids."

Sounds like we advocates have our marching orders. It's our job, along with our partners and allies, to make advertising restrictions to children waaaay more likely.


San Francisco (3) suicide nets (1) violence prevention (8) children's health (3) paper tigers (1) food (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) community organizing (1) cancer research (1) Whiteclay (4) obesity prevention (1) gatorade bolt game (1) water security (1) Marion Nestle (1) online marketing (1) food justice (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) tobacco tax (1) public health (69) healthy eating (1) liana winett (1) soda industry (4) FCC (1) filibuster (1) authentic voices (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) food and beverage marketing (3) Telluride (1) Amanda Fallin (1) cannes lions festival (1) Proposition 47 (1) media analysis (5) child sexual abuse (5) cancer prevention (1) language (6) Golden Gate Bridge (2) communication (2) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) American Beverage Association (1) vaccines (1) seat belt laws (1) Texas (1) industry appeals to choice (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) Merck (1) news monitoring (1) Joe Paterno (1) Black Lives Matter (1) choice (1) marketing (1) junk food (2) campaign finance (1) HPV vaccine (1) reproductive justice (1) community health (1) cosmetics (1) Gardasil (1) suicide prevention (2) Penn State (3) food industry (4) Pine Ridge reservation (1) snap (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) naacp (1) Bill Cosby (1) values (1) ssb (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) front groups (1) diabetes prevention (1) institutional accountability (1) Aurora (1) mental health (2) obesity (10) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) childhood obesity (1) personal responsibility (3) childhood adversity (1) california (1) environmental health (1) tobacco control (2) framing (14) autism (1) summer camps (1) food marketing (4) Nickelodeon (1) physical activity (1) Let's Move (1) food deserts (1) election 2016 (1) nanny state (2) sanitation (1) Donald Trump (2) privilege (1) equity (3) Oglala Sioux (3) Michelle Obama (1) apha (2) Connecticut shooting (1) sports drinks (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) emergency contraception (1) beverage industry (2) strategic communication (1) social media (2) junk food marketing (4) news analysis (3) government intrusion (1) Sam Kass (1) social justice (2) Big Soda (2) Proposition 29 (1) suicide barrier (2) Chile (1) sexism (2) Sandy Hook (2) soda (12) public health data (1) sexual health (1) gun violence (1) Wendy Davis (1) tobacco (5) Citizens United (1) stigma (1) prison system (1) soda taxes (2) default frame (1) sexual violence (2) sandusky (2) Twitter (1) Coca-Cola (3) george lakoff (1) health care (1) race (1) health equity (10) news coverage (1) tobacco industry (2) gun control (2) collaboration (1) SB-5 (1) food environment (1) public health policy (2) product safety (1) Big Food (2) Tea Party (1) weight of the nation (1) safety (1) alcohol (5) breastfeeding (3) Rachel Grana (1) racism (1) messaging (3) auto safety (1) target marketing (8) social change (1) news strategy (1) community violence (1) SSBs (1) media (7) prevention (1) community (1) food access (1) measure N (2) Colorado (1) SB 1000 (1) corporate social responsibility (1) water (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) soda tax (11) gender (1) sexual assault (1) beauty products (1) cap the tap (1) elephant triggers (1) social math (1) ACEs (2) food swamps (1) Newtown (1) youth (1) world water day (1) cervical cancer (1) McDonald's (1) chronic disease (2) Berkeley (2) abortion (1) white house (1) Big Tobacco (3) PepsiCo (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) news (2) cigarette advertising (1) digital marketing (2) sugary drinks (10) prison phone calls (1) communication strategy (1) paula deen (1) democracy (1) regulation (2) indoor smoking ban (1) media bites (1) violence (2) media advocacy (23) built environment (2) Happy Meals (1) advocacy (3) childhood obestiy conference (1) Measure O (1) education (1) childhood trauma (3) soda warning labels (1) political correctness (1) community safety (1) SB 402 (1) women's health (2) structural racism (1) El Monte (3) genital warts (1) Catholic church (1) journalism (1) Dora the Explorer (1) inequities (1) new year's resolutions (1) diabetes (1) Richmond (5) nonprofit communications (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) Bloomberg (3)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: