McDonald's says no to kids' health

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Last year, San Francisco passed a groundbreaking ordinance to require restaurants offering free toys in kids' meals to make sure that those meals met certain minimum -- and very reasonable -- nutrition requirements. Now, McDonald's has decided to sidestep the law and charge a dime for each of its Happy Meal toys so that it doesn't have to make the meals any healthier (read: less bad) for kids. The kicker: They're painting this as an act of charity and donating those dimes to the local Ronald McDonald House.

Lawyer and writer Michele Simon has taken the food giant to task for this stunt and questioned whether the 10-cent toy gimmick really is in full compliance with the law. And good for her for doing so. After all, this law was designed specifically to "disassociate toys from unhealthy food," as Simon put it.

But what if McDonald's is in full compliance? Then what? Are they in the clear? Do they get to go on with business as usual?

Hardly. Pressure is on from parents and advocates everywhere. They are holding McDonald's and other food and beverage companies responsible for the health harms that their products cause. Why? Because we have a health crisis in this country and food companies are unwilling to reign in their junk food marketing to help abate it. So, whether McDonald's actions are legal are not, the real issue here -- children's health -- should not get lost in the conversation.

Even as childhood obesity rates and related health problems continue to climb, McDonald's and other companies seem as insistent as ever on circumventing parents and marketing high-calorie, low-nutrition food and drinks to young kids. Research from Yale's Rudd Center on Food Policy and Obesity has showed that McDonald's is using online marketing to attract children and teens. And numerous case studies -- compiled by BMSG in partnership with the Center for Digital Democracy and National Policy & Legal Analysis Network to Prevent Childhood Obesity -- show that McDonald's is among many companies that use aggressive digital marketing to target youth and get them to engage and bond with brands.

What does all of this mean? First, it reaffirms what so many already know: that advocates, parents, policymakers and health professionals of all stripes have their work cut out for them. Big Food's gloves are off, and it will take continued action on the part of all of these groups to chip away at the power that allows them to continually flout health.

Second, it means that food and beverage companies have their work cut out for them too. Michele Simon is just one of many heavyweights in the public health arena who -- I think it's safe to say -- is not about to let Big Food off the hook. Every Happy Meal-type shenanigan just emboldens those who care about public health even more. And the general public is growing impatient with seeing such institutions flex disproportionate amounts of power in ways that hurt society collectively. The resilience and tenacity of the Occupy movement speak to this. When people band together in the name of a shared goal and decide they've had enough of something, history shows the underdog can absolutely prevail. Public health and community groups have proven this with tobacco, with childhood lead poisoning, with seat belt laws, etc. -- and we're adding the food environment to that list.

San Francisco (3) alcohol (5) snap (1) childhood trauma (3) language (6) physical activity (1) women's health (2) gun violence (1) mental health (2) breastfeeding (3) public health policy (2) soda tax (11) sexism (2) FCC (1) health care (1) suicide prevention (2) child sexual abuse (5) suicide nets (1) target marketing (7) inequities (1) personal responsibility (3) media analysis (5) Coca-Cola (3) environmental health (1) Citizens United (1) sugary drinks (10) Golden Gate Bridge (2) Marion Nestle (1) HPV vaccine (1) soda warning labels (1) vaccines (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) SB 402 (1) news monitoring (1) Whiteclay (4) summer camps (1) Big Tobacco (3) prison system (1) new year's resolutions (1) product safety (1) Michelle Obama (1) food access (1) industry appeals to choice (1) violence (1) public health data (1) social justice (1) sexual violence (2) suicide barrier (2) public health (66) framing (14) prison phone calls (1) cap the tap (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) news (2) seat belt laws (1) Sandy Hook (2) Gardasil (1) paper tigers (1) sanitation (1) privilege (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) soda taxes (2) childhood lead poisoning (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) advocacy (3) food deserts (1) Aurora (1) regulation (2) george lakoff (1) values (1) filibuster (1) cervical cancer (1) tobacco (5) Oglala Sioux (3) default frame (1) media advocacy (21) Nickelodeon (1) gun control (2) Big Soda (2) education (1) Twitter (1) collaboration (1) online marketing (1) Rachel Grana (1) community safety (1) Amanda Fallin (1) cancer prevention (1) diabetes prevention (1) world water day (1) Proposition 29 (1) news analysis (2) junk food (2) liana winett (1) measure N (2) government intrusion (1) stigma (1) healthy eating (1) apha (2) SB-5 (1) Texas (1) chronic disease (2) Oakland Unified School District (1) autism (1) digital marketing (2) Proposition 47 (1) corporate social responsibility (1) Happy Meals (1) obesity prevention (1) food justice (1) Merck (1) authentic voices (1) front groups (1) white house (1) childhood adversity (1) community organizing (1) marketing (1) communication (2) obesity (10) youth (1) campaign finance (1) institutional accountability (1) political correctness (1) news strategy (1) sexual assault (1) sexual health (1) choice (1) Berkeley (2) ACEs (2) Donald Trump (2) tobacco tax (1) nanny state (2) genital warts (1) abortion (1) Tea Party (1) community health (1) media (7) Connecticut shooting (1) Chile (1) paula deen (1) food and beverage marketing (3) children's health (3) auto safety (1) social media (2) beverage industry (2) messaging (3) food environment (1) racism (1) beauty products (1) indoor smoking ban (1) Sam Kass (1) equity (3) Bill Cosby (1) weight of the nation (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) water security (1) news coverage (1) Measure O (1) california (1) El Monte (3) food marketing (3) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) cancer research (1) race (1) American Beverage Association (1) gatorade bolt game (1) tobacco control (2) media bites (1) childhood obesity (1) emergency contraception (1) naacp (1) Catholic church (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) Joe Paterno (1) Newtown (1) McDonald's (1) soda (12) Telluride (1) PepsiCo (1) food industry (4) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) Let's Move (1) prevention (1) Big Food (2) social math (1) Dora the Explorer (1) food (1) SSBs (1) sports drinks (1) elephant triggers (1) social change (1) gender (1) Wendy Davis (1) diabetes (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) junk food marketing (3) violence prevention (8) ssb (1) SB 1000 (1) structural racism (1) soda industry (4) cigarette advertising (1) Bloomberg (3) Colorado (1) community violence (1) built environment (2) journalism (1) reproductive justice (1) cosmetics (1) Penn State (3) tobacco industry (2) health equity (10) democracy (1) sandusky (2) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) election 2016 (1) food swamps (1) water (1) Richmond (5)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: