McDonald's says no to kids' health

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Last year, San Francisco passed a groundbreaking ordinance to require restaurants offering free toys in kids' meals to make sure that those meals met certain minimum -- and very reasonable -- nutrition requirements. Now, McDonald's has decided to sidestep the law and charge a dime for each of its Happy Meal toys so that it doesn't have to make the meals any healthier (read: less bad) for kids. The kicker: They're painting this as an act of charity and donating those dimes to the local Ronald McDonald House.

Lawyer and writer Michele Simon has taken the food giant to task for this stunt and questioned whether the 10-cent toy gimmick really is in full compliance with the law. And good for her for doing so. After all, this law was designed specifically to "disassociate toys from unhealthy food," as Simon put it.

But what if McDonald's is in full compliance? Then what? Are they in the clear? Do they get to go on with business as usual?

Hardly. Pressure is on from parents and advocates everywhere. They are holding McDonald's and other food and beverage companies responsible for the health harms that their products cause. Why? Because we have a health crisis in this country and food companies are unwilling to reign in their junk food marketing to help abate it. So, whether McDonald's actions are legal are not, the real issue here -- children's health -- should not get lost in the conversation.

Even as childhood obesity rates and related health problems continue to climb, McDonald's and other companies seem as insistent as ever on circumventing parents and marketing high-calorie, low-nutrition food and drinks to young kids. Research from Yale's Rudd Center on Food Policy and Obesity has showed that McDonald's is using online marketing to attract children and teens. And numerous case studies -- compiled by BMSG in partnership with the Center for Digital Democracy and National Policy & Legal Analysis Network to Prevent Childhood Obesity -- show that McDonald's is among many companies that use aggressive digital marketing to target youth and get them to engage and bond with brands.

What does all of this mean? First, it reaffirms what so many already know: that advocates, parents, policymakers and health professionals of all stripes have their work cut out for them. Big Food's gloves are off, and it will take continued action on the part of all of these groups to chip away at the power that allows them to continually flout health.

Second, it means that food and beverage companies have their work cut out for them too. Michele Simon is just one of many heavyweights in the public health arena who -- I think it's safe to say -- is not about to let Big Food off the hook. Every Happy Meal-type shenanigan just emboldens those who care about public health even more. And the general public is growing impatient with seeing such institutions flex disproportionate amounts of power in ways that hurt society collectively. The resilience and tenacity of the Occupy movement speak to this. When people band together in the name of a shared goal and decide they've had enough of something, history shows the underdog can absolutely prevail. Public health and community groups have proven this with tobacco, with childhood lead poisoning, with seat belt laws, etc. -- and we're adding the food environment to that list.


prison system (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) violence prevention (6) public health (53) Proposition 29 (1) stigma (1) Measure O (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) sexism (1) obesity (9) childhood obesity (1) Chile (1) gatorade bolt game (1) healthy eating (1) vaccines (1) Happy Meals (1) sports drinks (1) San Francisco (2) nanny state (2) Newtown (1) product safety (1) tobacco tax (1) food and beverage marketing (3) SB 1000 (1) new year's resolutions (1) beauty products (1) Berkeley (1) social justice (1) sugary drinks (6) abortion (1) snap (1) PepsiCo (1) structural racism (1) physical activity (1) media analysis (1) water security (1) Let's Move (1) children's health (3) liana winett (1) breastfeeding (3) world water day (1) messaging (2) Dora the Explorer (1) diabetes (1) Oglala Sioux (3) Pine Ridge reservation (1) online marketing (1) Amanda Fallin (1) environmental health (1) Big Soda (1) industry appeals to choice (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) reproductive justice (1) summer camps (1) Coca-Cola (3) obesity prevention (1) food deserts (1) Michelle Obama (1) communication (2) genital warts (1) Rachel Grana (1) Citizens United (1) soda tax (9) media (3) chronic disease (2) Connecticut shooting (1) suicide prevention (2) child sexual abuse (5) california (1) women's health (2) food justice (1) tobacco control (2) target marketing (5) American Beverage Association (1) autism (1) soda warning labels (1) seat belt laws (1) SB-5 (1) indoor smoking ban (1) corporate social responsibility (1) HPV vaccine (1) sanitation (1) cancer research (1) social media (1) Bloomberg (3) FCC (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) Texas (1) Big Tobacco (3) language (6) sandusky (2) news strategy (1) junk food marketing (3) apha (1) Whiteclay (4) Marion Nestle (1) Richmond (4) Colorado (1) Merck (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) beverage industry (1) built environment (2) measure N (2) health equity (9) media bites (1) food industry (2) food (1) Sam Kass (1) Wendy Davis (1) water (1) Penn State (3) cervical cancer (1) community health (1) food access (1) tobacco (4) soda (12) cigarette advertising (1) food swamps (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) food marketing (3) ssb (1) El Monte (2) McDonald's (1) Joe Paterno (1) public health policy (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) regulation (2) junk food (1) sexual health (1) weight of the nation (1) filibuster (1) digital marketing (2) Gardasil (1) gun violence (1) suicide barrier (2) cosmetics (1) values (1) elephant triggers (1) cancer prevention (1) collaboration (1) white house (1) SB 402 (1) alcohol (4) cap the tap (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) auto safety (1) equity (3) Oakland Unified School District (1) prison phone calls (1) paula deen (1) gun control (2) food environment (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) tobacco industry (2) advocacy (3) institutional accountability (1) government intrusion (1) mental health (2) gender (1) social change (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) Tea Party (1) naacp (1) Sandy Hook (2) sugar-sweetened beverages (1) Catholic church (1) Aurora (1) media advocacy (13) front groups (1) inequities (1) suicide nets (1) personal responsibility (2) george lakoff (1) SSBs (1) soda industry (4) campaign finance (1) Big Food (2) Nickelodeon (1) health care (1) privilege (1) marketing (1) choice (1) framing (9) prevention (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: