McDonald's says no to kids' health

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Last year, San Francisco passed a groundbreaking ordinance to require restaurants offering free toys in kids' meals to make sure that those meals met certain minimum -- and very reasonable -- nutrition requirements. Now, McDonald's has decided to sidestep the law and charge a dime for each of its Happy Meal toys so that it doesn't have to make the meals any healthier (read: less bad) for kids. The kicker: They're painting this as an act of charity and donating those dimes to the local Ronald McDonald House.

Lawyer and writer Michele Simon has taken the food giant to task for this stunt and questioned whether the 10-cent toy gimmick really is in full compliance with the law. And good for her for doing so. After all, this law was designed specifically to "disassociate toys from unhealthy food," as Simon put it.

But what if McDonald's is in full compliance? Then what? Are they in the clear? Do they get to go on with business as usual?

Hardly. Pressure is on from parents and advocates everywhere. They are holding McDonald's and other food and beverage companies responsible for the health harms that their products cause. Why? Because we have a health crisis in this country and food companies are unwilling to reign in their junk food marketing to help abate it. So, whether McDonald's actions are legal are not, the real issue here -- children's health -- should not get lost in the conversation.

Even as childhood obesity rates and related health problems continue to climb, McDonald's and other companies seem as insistent as ever on circumventing parents and marketing high-calorie, low-nutrition food and drinks to young kids. Research from Yale's Rudd Center on Food Policy and Obesity has showed that McDonald's is using online marketing to attract children and teens. And numerous case studies -- compiled by BMSG in partnership with the Center for Digital Democracy and National Policy & Legal Analysis Network to Prevent Childhood Obesity -- show that McDonald's is among many companies that use aggressive digital marketing to target youth and get them to engage and bond with brands.

What does all of this mean? First, it reaffirms what so many already know: that advocates, parents, policymakers and health professionals of all stripes have their work cut out for them. Big Food's gloves are off, and it will take continued action on the part of all of these groups to chip away at the power that allows them to continually flout health.

Second, it means that food and beverage companies have their work cut out for them too. Michele Simon is just one of many heavyweights in the public health arena who -- I think it's safe to say -- is not about to let Big Food off the hook. Every Happy Meal-type shenanigan just emboldens those who care about public health even more. And the general public is growing impatient with seeing such institutions flex disproportionate amounts of power in ways that hurt society collectively. The resilience and tenacity of the Occupy movement speak to this. When people band together in the name of a shared goal and decide they've had enough of something, history shows the underdog can absolutely prevail. Public health and community groups have proven this with tobacco, with childhood lead poisoning, with seat belt laws, etc. -- and we're adding the food environment to that list.

cervical cancer (1) childhood trauma (3) values (1) inequities (1) violence (1) prison phone calls (1) child sexual abuse (5) environmental health (1) Aurora (1) social justice (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) suicide nets (1) San Francisco (3) government intrusion (1) news analysis (2) Marion Nestle (1) cap the tap (1) media advocacy (19) tobacco control (2) industry appeals to choice (1) childhood adversity (1) gender (1) news (2) autism (1) cosmetics (1) Colorado (1) health care (1) food deserts (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) food access (1) Wendy Davis (1) front groups (1) campaign finance (1) filibuster (1) marketing (1) paula deen (1) structural racism (1) youth (1) violence prevention (8) Proposition 29 (1) apha (2) sanitation (1) white house (1) Newtown (1) Joe Paterno (1) messaging (3) george lakoff (1) Measure O (1) food and beverage marketing (3) PepsiCo (1) soda industry (4) social math (1) sexual health (1) Dora the Explorer (1) ACEs (2) snap (1) elephant triggers (1) Sam Kass (1) diabetes prevention (1) sugary drinks (10) childhood obesity (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) Sandy Hook (2) media bites (1) sexual assault (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) food swamps (1) Telluride (1) gun violence (1) framing (12) institutional accountability (1) junk food marketing (3) chronic disease (2) weight of the nation (1) measure N (2) privilege (1) soda (12) Big Food (2) indoor smoking ban (1) women's health (2) sports drinks (1) Gardasil (1) gun control (2) summer camps (1) online marketing (1) obesity prevention (1) SB 1000 (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) Connecticut shooting (1) Nickelodeon (1) news coverage (1) Let's Move (1) water (1) public health (64) Chile (1) beverage industry (2) prevention (1) public health data (1) Penn State (3) McDonald's (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) Citizens United (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) vaccines (1) food environment (1) beauty products (1) physical activity (1) personal responsibility (3) SB-5 (1) new year's resolutions (1) Big Tobacco (3) built environment (2) healthy eating (1) tobacco (5) communication (2) community violence (1) social change (1) news monitoring (1) soda warning labels (1) Oglala Sioux (3) adverse childhood experiences (3) Berkeley (2) cancer research (1) regulation (2) junk food marketing to kids (2) abortion (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) children's health (3) Tea Party (1) health equity (10) media (6) default frame (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) media analysis (4) Proposition 47 (1) sandusky (2) water security (1) stigma (1) tobacco industry (2) target marketing (7) tobacco tax (1) seat belt laws (1) social media (2) sexism (1) breastfeeding (3) genital warts (1) mental health (2) public health policy (2) advocacy (3) food (1) equity (3) collaboration (1) food justice (1) American Beverage Association (1) community safety (1) Texas (1) auto safety (1) naacp (1) news strategy (1) digital marketing (2) El Monte (3) Big Soda (2) suicide barrier (2) education (1) Whiteclay (4) Catholic church (1) Richmond (5) SSBs (1) Coca-Cola (3) sexual violence (2) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) soda tax (11) reproductive justice (1) language (6) choice (1) california (1) Rachel Grana (1) Merck (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) SB 402 (1) product safety (1) Twitter (1) world water day (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) nanny state (2) Johnson & Johnson (1) emergency contraception (1) junk food (2) corporate social responsibility (1) Amanda Fallin (1) diabetes (1) community health (1) prison system (1) Bloomberg (3) Bill Cosby (1) gatorade bolt game (1) food marketing (3) liana winett (1) suicide prevention (2) ssb (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) paper tigers (1) FCC (1) race (1) cigarette advertising (1) obesity (10) cancer prevention (1) HPV vaccine (1) alcohol (5) Happy Meals (1) food industry (4) Michelle Obama (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: