McDonald's says no to kids' health

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Last year, San Francisco passed a groundbreaking ordinance to require restaurants offering free toys in kids' meals to make sure that those meals met certain minimum -- and very reasonable -- nutrition requirements. Now, McDonald's has decided to sidestep the law and charge a dime for each of its Happy Meal toys so that it doesn't have to make the meals any healthier (read: less bad) for kids. The kicker: They're painting this as an act of charity and donating those dimes to the local Ronald McDonald House.

Lawyer and writer Michele Simon has taken the food giant to task for this stunt and questioned whether the 10-cent toy gimmick really is in full compliance with the law. And good for her for doing so. After all, this law was designed specifically to "disassociate toys from unhealthy food," as Simon put it.

But what if McDonald's is in full compliance? Then what? Are they in the clear? Do they get to go on with business as usual?

Hardly. Pressure is on from parents and advocates everywhere. They are holding McDonald's and other food and beverage companies responsible for the health harms that their products cause. Why? Because we have a health crisis in this country and food companies are unwilling to reign in their junk food marketing to help abate it. So, whether McDonald's actions are legal are not, the real issue here -- children's health -- should not get lost in the conversation.

Even as childhood obesity rates and related health problems continue to climb, McDonald's and other companies seem as insistent as ever on circumventing parents and marketing high-calorie, low-nutrition food and drinks to young kids. Research from Yale's Rudd Center on Food Policy and Obesity has showed that McDonald's is using online marketing to attract children and teens. And numerous case studies -- compiled by BMSG in partnership with the Center for Digital Democracy and National Policy & Legal Analysis Network to Prevent Childhood Obesity -- show that McDonald's is among many companies that use aggressive digital marketing to target youth and get them to engage and bond with brands.

What does all of this mean? First, it reaffirms what so many already know: that advocates, parents, policymakers and health professionals of all stripes have their work cut out for them. Big Food's gloves are off, and it will take continued action on the part of all of these groups to chip away at the power that allows them to continually flout health.

Second, it means that food and beverage companies have their work cut out for them too. Michele Simon is just one of many heavyweights in the public health arena who -- I think it's safe to say -- is not about to let Big Food off the hook. Every Happy Meal-type shenanigan just emboldens those who care about public health even more. And the general public is growing impatient with seeing such institutions flex disproportionate amounts of power in ways that hurt society collectively. The resilience and tenacity of the Occupy movement speak to this. When people band together in the name of a shared goal and decide they've had enough of something, history shows the underdog can absolutely prevail. Public health and community groups have proven this with tobacco, with childhood lead poisoning, with seat belt laws, etc. -- and we're adding the food environment to that list.

food and beverage marketing (3) prevention (1) advocacy (3) suicide prevention (2) tobacco industry (2) Pine Ridge reservation (1) SSBs (1) water (1) physical activity (1) violence prevention (8) campaign finance (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) sanitation (1) Colorado (1) snap (1) naacp (1) cancer prevention (1) news (2) Johnson & Johnson (1) communication (2) news analysis (3) Twitter (1) prison system (1) food (1) tobacco control (2) Proposition 47 (1) Black Lives Matter (1) marketing (1) auto safety (1) sexual health (1) Berkeley (2) Oakland Unified School District (1) government intrusion (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) news coverage (1) media advocacy (21) social media (2) community health (1) race (1) youth (1) racism (1) Sam Kass (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) soda industry (4) autism (1) SB 402 (1) media (7) Sandy Hook (2) food access (1) water security (1) white house (1) cancer research (1) target marketing (7) education (1) gatorade bolt game (1) liana winett (1) Gardasil (1) language (6) california (1) sports drinks (1) Bill Cosby (1) front groups (1) authentic voices (1) Let's Move (1) election 2016 (1) reproductive justice (1) choice (1) Donald Trump (2) vaccines (1) privilege (1) Oglala Sioux (3) seat belt laws (1) childhood trauma (3) SB 1000 (1) breastfeeding (3) Proposition 29 (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) news strategy (1) Telluride (1) food swamps (1) summer camps (1) ACEs (2) Chile (1) political correctness (1) nanny state (2) social math (1) Whiteclay (4) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) industry appeals to choice (1) soda warning labels (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) Newtown (1) digital marketing (2) new year's resolutions (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) junk food (2) structural racism (1) Citizens United (1) food environment (1) Bloomberg (3) equity (3) built environment (2) El Monte (3) childhood obesity (1) regulation (2) healthy eating (1) sexual violence (2) product safety (1) beauty products (1) mental health (2) soda taxes (2) diabetes prevention (1) democracy (1) sexual assault (1) media bites (1) Big Food (2) george lakoff (1) public health data (1) prison phone calls (1) Amanda Fallin (1) childhood adversity (1) public health (67) health care (1) child sexual abuse (5) obesity prevention (1) Big Tobacco (3) cervical cancer (1) messaging (3) Richmond (5) PepsiCo (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) cap the tap (1) community organizing (1) violence (2) environmental health (1) Michelle Obama (1) personal responsibility (3) abortion (1) San Francisco (3) public health policy (2) gun violence (1) social justice (1) Rachel Grana (1) ssb (1) Connecticut shooting (1) food deserts (1) HPV vaccine (1) weight of the nation (1) genital warts (1) collaboration (1) indoor smoking ban (1) emergency contraception (1) world water day (1) news monitoring (1) safety (1) food justice (1) media analysis (5) chronic disease (2) FCC (1) Coca-Cola (3) Measure O (1) community violence (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) values (1) Happy Meals (1) community (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) Merck (1) gender (1) Catholic church (1) elephant triggers (1) tobacco tax (1) McDonald's (1) tobacco (5) soda tax (11) adverse childhood experiences (3) inequities (1) children's health (3) women's health (2) social change (1) cigarette advertising (1) paula deen (1) sandusky (2) soda (12) journalism (1) cosmetics (1) Big Soda (2) measure N (2) institutional accountability (1) stigma (1) beverage industry (2) diabetes (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) Texas (1) health equity (10) corporate social responsibility (1) Wendy Davis (1) Dora the Explorer (1) filibuster (1) obesity (10) American Beverage Association (1) Penn State (3) community safety (1) sugary drinks (10) food industry (4) Nickelodeon (1) framing (14) Aurora (1) suicide barrier (2) sexism (2) Tea Party (1) junk food marketing (3) SB-5 (1) alcohol (5) paper tigers (1) Joe Paterno (1) apha (2) gun control (2) default frame (1) suicide nets (1) Marion Nestle (1) online marketing (1) food marketing (3)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: