McDonald's says no to kids' health

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Last year, San Francisco passed a groundbreaking ordinance to require restaurants offering free toys in kids' meals to make sure that those meals met certain minimum -- and very reasonable -- nutrition requirements. Now, McDonald's has decided to sidestep the law and charge a dime for each of its Happy Meal toys so that it doesn't have to make the meals any healthier (read: less bad) for kids. The kicker: They're painting this as an act of charity and donating those dimes to the local Ronald McDonald House.

Lawyer and writer Michele Simon has taken the food giant to task for this stunt and questioned whether the 10-cent toy gimmick really is in full compliance with the law. And good for her for doing so. After all, this law was designed specifically to "disassociate toys from unhealthy food," as Simon put it.

But what if McDonald's is in full compliance? Then what? Are they in the clear? Do they get to go on with business as usual?

Hardly. Pressure is on from parents and advocates everywhere. They are holding McDonald's and other food and beverage companies responsible for the health harms that their products cause. Why? Because we have a health crisis in this country and food companies are unwilling to reign in their junk food marketing to help abate it. So, whether McDonald's actions are legal are not, the real issue here -- children's health -- should not get lost in the conversation.

Even as childhood obesity rates and related health problems continue to climb, McDonald's and other companies seem as insistent as ever on circumventing parents and marketing high-calorie, low-nutrition food and drinks to young kids. Research from Yale's Rudd Center on Food Policy and Obesity has showed that McDonald's is using online marketing to attract children and teens. And numerous case studies -- compiled by BMSG in partnership with the Center for Digital Democracy and National Policy & Legal Analysis Network to Prevent Childhood Obesity -- show that McDonald's is among many companies that use aggressive digital marketing to target youth and get them to engage and bond with brands.

What does all of this mean? First, it reaffirms what so many already know: that advocates, parents, policymakers and health professionals of all stripes have their work cut out for them. Big Food's gloves are off, and it will take continued action on the part of all of these groups to chip away at the power that allows them to continually flout health.

Second, it means that food and beverage companies have their work cut out for them too. Michele Simon is just one of many heavyweights in the public health arena who -- I think it's safe to say -- is not about to let Big Food off the hook. Every Happy Meal-type shenanigan just emboldens those who care about public health even more. And the general public is growing impatient with seeing such institutions flex disproportionate amounts of power in ways that hurt society collectively. The resilience and tenacity of the Occupy movement speak to this. When people band together in the name of a shared goal and decide they've had enough of something, history shows the underdog can absolutely prevail. Public health and community groups have proven this with tobacco, with childhood lead poisoning, with seat belt laws, etc. -- and we're adding the food environment to that list.

ACEs (2) sexual assault (1) soda (12) Sandy Hook (2) childhood lead poisoning (1) values (1) women's health (2) Proposition 29 (1) Richmond (5) Proposition 47 (1) language (6) community (1) cosmetics (1) snap (1) industry appeals to choice (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) regulation (2) food deserts (1) FCC (1) health equity (10) naacp (1) abortion (1) apha (2) product safety (1) Citizens United (1) george lakoff (1) Twitter (1) sandusky (2) Tea Party (1) public health data (1) safety (1) personal responsibility (3) food and beverage marketing (3) genital warts (1) sports drinks (1) community violence (1) communication (2) community health (1) food justice (1) prevention (1) public health policy (2) sexual violence (2) soda tax (11) Marion Nestle (1) indoor smoking ban (1) cannes lions festival (1) soda industry (4) Telluride (1) El Monte (3) diabetes (1) media analysis (5) emergency contraception (1) violence (2) PepsiCo (1) American Beverage Association (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) news (2) sexual health (1) suicide barrier (2) Black Lives Matter (1) Aurora (1) weight of the nation (1) framing (14) Rachel Grana (1) summer camps (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) liana winett (1) McDonald's (1) news monitoring (1) political correctness (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) soda taxes (2) tobacco industry (2) community organizing (1) structural racism (1) government intrusion (1) obesity prevention (1) Measure O (1) Penn State (3) food swamps (1) Nickelodeon (1) filibuster (1) children's health (3) Connecticut shooting (1) childhood adversity (1) Texas (1) Sam Kass (1) food marketing (4) democracy (1) Gardasil (1) healthy eating (1) SB 402 (1) food industry (4) Coca-Cola (3) SB-5 (1) target marketing (8) junk food (2) nanny state (2) inequities (1) messaging (3) Joe Paterno (1) cancer prevention (1) communication strategy (1) obesity (10) prison phone calls (1) junk food marketing (4) beauty products (1) corporate social responsibility (1) soda warning labels (1) digital marketing (2) sexism (2) autism (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) violence prevention (8) childhood obesity (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) social justice (2) environmental health (1) gender (1) youth (1) paula deen (1) online marketing (1) stigma (1) mental health (2) Bloomberg (3) food environment (1) Colorado (1) advocacy (3) paper tigers (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) Amanda Fallin (1) suicide prevention (2) Big Food (2) diabetes prevention (1) food (1) suicide nets (1) Happy Meals (1) election 2016 (1) news strategy (1) Dora the Explorer (1) HPV vaccine (1) strategic communication (1) gun control (2) junk food marketing to kids (2) auto safety (1) sugary drinks (10) new year's resolutions (1) cigarette advertising (1) institutional accountability (1) Berkeley (2) choice (1) cancer research (1) Whiteclay (4) Jerry Sandusky (3) Big Soda (2) Oakland Unified School District (1) marketing (1) Oglala Sioux (3) child sexual abuse (5) Pine Ridge reservation (1) vaccines (1) prison system (1) elephant triggers (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) media advocacy (23) media (7) reproductive justice (1) cervical cancer (1) world water day (1) journalism (1) food access (1) privilege (1) childhood trauma (3) SB 1000 (1) water (1) equity (3) beverage industry (2) health care (1) physical activity (1) race (1) front groups (1) campaign finance (1) Newtown (1) breastfeeding (3) alcohol (5) gun violence (1) SSBs (1) california (1) racism (1) Donald Trump (2) social media (2) tobacco tax (1) social math (1) gatorade bolt game (1) built environment (2) Chile (1) Bill Cosby (1) Let's Move (1) education (1) Michelle Obama (1) seat belt laws (1) Wendy Davis (1) Merck (1) nonprofit communications (1) default frame (1) news analysis (3) cap the tap (1) Catholic church (1) tobacco control (2) Twitter for advocacy (1) ssb (1) media bites (1) San Francisco (3) collaboration (1) chronic disease (2) authentic voices (1) community safety (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) tobacco (5) sanitation (1) news coverage (1) water security (1) social change (1) white house (1) public health (69) adverse childhood experiences (3) Big Tobacco (3) measure N (2)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: