McDonald's says no to kids' health

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Last year, San Francisco passed a groundbreaking ordinance to require restaurants offering free toys in kids' meals to make sure that those meals met certain minimum -- and very reasonable -- nutrition requirements. Now, McDonald's has decided to sidestep the law and charge a dime for each of its Happy Meal toys so that it doesn't have to make the meals any healthier (read: less bad) for kids. The kicker: They're painting this as an act of charity and donating those dimes to the local Ronald McDonald House.

Lawyer and writer Michele Simon has taken the food giant to task for this stunt and questioned whether the 10-cent toy gimmick really is in full compliance with the law. And good for her for doing so. After all, this law was designed specifically to "disassociate toys from unhealthy food," as Simon put it.

But what if McDonald's is in full compliance? Then what? Are they in the clear? Do they get to go on with business as usual?

Hardly. Pressure is on from parents and advocates everywhere. They are holding McDonald's and other food and beverage companies responsible for the health harms that their products cause. Why? Because we have a health crisis in this country and food companies are unwilling to reign in their junk food marketing to help abate it. So, whether McDonald's actions are legal are not, the real issue here -- children's health -- should not get lost in the conversation.

Even as childhood obesity rates and related health problems continue to climb, McDonald's and other companies seem as insistent as ever on circumventing parents and marketing high-calorie, low-nutrition food and drinks to young kids. Research from Yale's Rudd Center on Food Policy and Obesity has showed that McDonald's is using online marketing to attract children and teens. And numerous case studies -- compiled by BMSG in partnership with the Center for Digital Democracy and National Policy & Legal Analysis Network to Prevent Childhood Obesity -- show that McDonald's is among many companies that use aggressive digital marketing to target youth and get them to engage and bond with brands.

What does all of this mean? First, it reaffirms what so many already know: that advocates, parents, policymakers and health professionals of all stripes have their work cut out for them. Big Food's gloves are off, and it will take continued action on the part of all of these groups to chip away at the power that allows them to continually flout health.

Second, it means that food and beverage companies have their work cut out for them too. Michele Simon is just one of many heavyweights in the public health arena who -- I think it's safe to say -- is not about to let Big Food off the hook. Every Happy Meal-type shenanigan just emboldens those who care about public health even more. And the general public is growing impatient with seeing such institutions flex disproportionate amounts of power in ways that hurt society collectively. The resilience and tenacity of the Occupy movement speak to this. When people band together in the name of a shared goal and decide they've had enough of something, history shows the underdog can absolutely prevail. Public health and community groups have proven this with tobacco, with childhood lead poisoning, with seat belt laws, etc. -- and we're adding the food environment to that list.


gatorade bolt game (1) environmental health (1) online marketing (1) junk food marketing (3) emergency contraception (1) diabetes (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) sandusky (2) Whiteclay (4) tobacco tax (1) regulation (2) physical activity (1) media bites (1) mental health (2) reproductive justice (1) white house (1) social media (2) ACEs (1) Connecticut shooting (1) sugary drinks (9) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) media (4) advocacy (3) Bloomberg (3) institutional accountability (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) public health (58) Richmond (5) childhood obestiy conference (1) childhood trauma (1) george lakoff (1) communication (2) Oakland Unified School District (1) corporate social responsibility (1) sexual health (1) Texas (1) water (1) california (1) food justice (1) Penn State (3) healthy eating (1) tobacco industry (2) suicide barrier (2) Merck (1) cap the tap (1) Dora the Explorer (1) abortion (1) soda (12) Sam Kass (1) public health data (1) FCC (1) beauty products (1) summer camps (1) race (1) Oglala Sioux (3) violence prevention (6) Measure O (1) cervical cancer (1) cancer prevention (1) diabetes prevention (1) privilege (1) personal responsibility (3) equity (3) marketing (1) news analysis (1) sports drinks (1) Twitter (1) public health policy (2) food (1) cancer research (1) seat belt laws (1) alcohol (4) genital warts (1) framing (11) ssb (1) digital marketing (2) Aurora (1) apha (1) Let's Move (1) media advocacy (18) water security (1) Rachel Grana (1) cosmetics (1) sexual assault (1) cigarette advertising (1) front groups (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) campaign finance (1) children's health (3) food environment (1) childhood adversity (1) news coverage (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) product safety (1) Berkeley (2) vaccines (1) Bill Cosby (1) child sexual abuse (5) SSBs (1) Big Soda (2) naacp (1) auto safety (1) target marketing (7) world water day (1) food deserts (1) media analysis (3) autism (1) values (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) Coca-Cola (3) health equity (9) sanitation (1) Tea Party (1) default frame (1) SB 402 (1) prevention (1) paula deen (1) Marion Nestle (1) violence (1) measure N (2) Telluride (1) soda tax (11) stigma (1) youth (1) food and beverage marketing (3) Proposition 29 (1) nanny state (2) beverage industry (1) El Monte (3) junk food marketing to kids (2) Citizens United (1) government intrusion (1) food swamps (1) Big Food (2) soda industry (4) McDonald's (1) American Beverage Association (1) indoor smoking ban (1) snap (1) gun control (2) messaging (3) choice (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) Amanda Fallin (1) prison system (1) filibuster (1) obesity prevention (1) chronic disease (2) suicide nets (1) SB 1000 (1) food industry (2) childhood lead poisoning (1) SB-5 (1) Chile (1) Wendy Davis (1) soda warning labels (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) elephant triggers (1) adverse childhood experiences (1) Michelle Obama (1) Nickelodeon (1) collaboration (1) obesity (9) tobacco control (2) gender (1) women's health (2) Catholic church (1) sexism (1) food access (1) Gardasil (1) social change (1) social justice (1) community health (1) Colorado (1) weight of the nation (1) tobacco (4) structural racism (1) sexual violence (1) prison phone calls (1) food marketing (3) Happy Meals (1) San Francisco (3) gun violence (1) suicide prevention (2) Newtown (1) social math (1) health care (1) language (6) junk food (2) built environment (2) Big Tobacco (3) Sandy Hook (2) breastfeeding (3) Johnson & Johnson (1) HPV vaccine (1) industry appeals to choice (1) new year's resolutions (1) inequities (1) Joe Paterno (1) liana winett (1) PepsiCo (1) news strategy (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) childhood obesity (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: