McDonald's says no to kids' health

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Last year, San Francisco passed a groundbreaking ordinance to require restaurants offering free toys in kids' meals to make sure that those meals met certain minimum -- and very reasonable -- nutrition requirements. Now, McDonald's has decided to sidestep the law and charge a dime for each of its Happy Meal toys so that it doesn't have to make the meals any healthier (read: less bad) for kids. The kicker: They're painting this as an act of charity and donating those dimes to the local Ronald McDonald House.

Lawyer and writer Michele Simon has taken the food giant to task for this stunt and questioned whether the 10-cent toy gimmick really is in full compliance with the law. And good for her for doing so. After all, this law was designed specifically to "disassociate toys from unhealthy food," as Simon put it.

But what if McDonald's is in full compliance? Then what? Are they in the clear? Do they get to go on with business as usual?

Hardly. Pressure is on from parents and advocates everywhere. They are holding McDonald's and other food and beverage companies responsible for the health harms that their products cause. Why? Because we have a health crisis in this country and food companies are unwilling to reign in their junk food marketing to help abate it. So, whether McDonald's actions are legal are not, the real issue here -- children's health -- should not get lost in the conversation.

Even as childhood obesity rates and related health problems continue to climb, McDonald's and other companies seem as insistent as ever on circumventing parents and marketing high-calorie, low-nutrition food and drinks to young kids. Research from Yale's Rudd Center on Food Policy and Obesity has showed that McDonald's is using online marketing to attract children and teens. And numerous case studies -- compiled by BMSG in partnership with the Center for Digital Democracy and National Policy & Legal Analysis Network to Prevent Childhood Obesity -- show that McDonald's is among many companies that use aggressive digital marketing to target youth and get them to engage and bond with brands.

What does all of this mean? First, it reaffirms what so many already know: that advocates, parents, policymakers and health professionals of all stripes have their work cut out for them. Big Food's gloves are off, and it will take continued action on the part of all of these groups to chip away at the power that allows them to continually flout health.

Second, it means that food and beverage companies have their work cut out for them too. Michele Simon is just one of many heavyweights in the public health arena who -- I think it's safe to say -- is not about to let Big Food off the hook. Every Happy Meal-type shenanigan just emboldens those who care about public health even more. And the general public is growing impatient with seeing such institutions flex disproportionate amounts of power in ways that hurt society collectively. The resilience and tenacity of the Occupy movement speak to this. When people band together in the name of a shared goal and decide they've had enough of something, history shows the underdog can absolutely prevail. Public health and community groups have proven this with tobacco, with childhood lead poisoning, with seat belt laws, etc. -- and we're adding the food environment to that list.


campaign finance (1) elephant triggers (1) messaging (3) government intrusion (1) environmental health (1) San Francisco (3) FCC (1) autism (1) filibuster (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) collaboration (1) Texas (1) product safety (1) sandusky (2) emergency contraception (1) El Monte (3) physical activity (1) Richmond (5) media analysis (6) equity (3) beauty products (1) media bites (1) healthy eating (1) SB 402 (1) liana winett (1) tobacco industry (2) food environment (1) paper tigers (1) gun control (2) corporate social responsibility (1) soda (12) child sexual abuse (5) women's health (2) election 2016 (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) abortion (1) communication (2) Dora the Explorer (1) junk food (2) safety (1) seat belt laws (1) institutional accountability (1) Amanda Fallin (1) chronic disease (2) Proposition 29 (1) Proposition 47 (1) community violence (1) prison phone calls (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) choice (1) Donald Trump (2) cervical cancer (1) democracy (1) SSBs (1) reproductive justice (1) Coca-Cola (3) suicide nets (1) cigarette advertising (1) gun violence (1) snap (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) food and beverage marketing (3) ssb (1) community safety (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) news (2) junk food marketing to kids (2) summer camps (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) food marketing (5) Chile (1) Berkeley (2) Tea Party (1) values (1) Bloomberg (3) public health (71) community health (1) nonprofit communications (1) industry appeals to choice (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) Marion Nestle (1) PepsiCo (1) social justice (2) tobacco control (2) paula deen (1) Sam Kass (1) indoor smoking ban (1) sexual violence (2) McDonald's (1) Happy Meals (1) Let's Move (1) Oglala Sioux (3) suicide barrier (2) framing (14) alcohol (5) Joe Paterno (1) breastfeeding (3) obesity (10) adverse childhood experiences (3) Big Tobacco (3) cap the tap (1) public health policy (2) Colorado (1) SB 1000 (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) world water day (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) ACEs (2) cannes lions festival (1) childhood obesity (1) Gardasil (1) sexual assault (1) health care (1) digital marketing (3) privilege (1) education (1) inequities (1) news analysis (3) language (6) community (1) race (1) sexual health (1) strategic communication (1) naacp (1) water (1) new year's resolutions (1) marketing (1) Connecticut shooting (1) communication strategy (1) auto safety (1) prison system (1) Catholic church (1) childhood trauma (3) media advocacy (23) water security (1) social math (1) genital warts (1) media (7) sanitation (1) soda tax (11) sexism (2) Penn State (3) cancer prevention (1) Rachel Grana (1) soda warning labels (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) obesity prevention (1) stigma (1) food deserts (1) journalism (1) nanny state (2) food swamps (1) Big Soda (2) Sandy Hook (2) target marketing (9) white house (1) food access (1) soda industry (4) Measure O (1) American Beverage Association (1) gender (1) authentic voices (1) personal responsibility (3) news monitoring (1) junk food marketing (4) diabetes prevention (1) Big Food (2) sports drinks (1) gatorade bolt game (1) public health data (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) soda taxes (2) built environment (2) Bill Cosby (1) weight of the nation (1) food industry (4) Citizens United (1) social change (1) vaccines (1) sugary drinks (10) online marketing (1) george lakoff (1) california (1) Whiteclay (4) measure N (2) Oakland Unified School District (1) violence (2) Telluride (1) Michelle Obama (1) community organizing (1) suicide prevention (2) diabetes (1) Merck (1) Twitter (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) Nickelodeon (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) HPV vaccine (1) default frame (1) health equity (10) tobacco tax (1) SB-5 (1) structural racism (1) Newtown (1) racism (1) violence prevention (8) mental health (2) youth (1) news strategy (1) advocacy (3) prevention (1) childhood adversity (1) Wendy Davis (1) regulation (2) news coverage (1) food (1) political correctness (1) cancer research (1) food justice (1) beverage industry (2) Aurora (1) Black Lives Matter (1) cosmetics (1) front groups (1) children's health (3) apha (3) social media (2) tobacco (5)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: