McDonald's says no to kids' health

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Last year, San Francisco passed a groundbreaking ordinance to require restaurants offering free toys in kids' meals to make sure that those meals met certain minimum -- and very reasonable -- nutrition requirements. Now, McDonald's has decided to sidestep the law and charge a dime for each of its Happy Meal toys so that it doesn't have to make the meals any healthier (read: less bad) for kids. The kicker: They're painting this as an act of charity and donating those dimes to the local Ronald McDonald House.

Lawyer and writer Michele Simon has taken the food giant to task for this stunt and questioned whether the 10-cent toy gimmick really is in full compliance with the law. And good for her for doing so. After all, this law was designed specifically to "disassociate toys from unhealthy food," as Simon put it.

But what if McDonald's is in full compliance? Then what? Are they in the clear? Do they get to go on with business as usual?

Hardly. Pressure is on from parents and advocates everywhere. They are holding McDonald's and other food and beverage companies responsible for the health harms that their products cause. Why? Because we have a health crisis in this country and food companies are unwilling to reign in their junk food marketing to help abate it. So, whether McDonald's actions are legal are not, the real issue here -- children's health -- should not get lost in the conversation.

Even as childhood obesity rates and related health problems continue to climb, McDonald's and other companies seem as insistent as ever on circumventing parents and marketing high-calorie, low-nutrition food and drinks to young kids. Research from Yale's Rudd Center on Food Policy and Obesity has showed that McDonald's is using online marketing to attract children and teens. And numerous case studies -- compiled by BMSG in partnership with the Center for Digital Democracy and National Policy & Legal Analysis Network to Prevent Childhood Obesity -- show that McDonald's is among many companies that use aggressive digital marketing to target youth and get them to engage and bond with brands.

What does all of this mean? First, it reaffirms what so many already know: that advocates, parents, policymakers and health professionals of all stripes have their work cut out for them. Big Food's gloves are off, and it will take continued action on the part of all of these groups to chip away at the power that allows them to continually flout health.

Second, it means that food and beverage companies have their work cut out for them too. Michele Simon is just one of many heavyweights in the public health arena who -- I think it's safe to say -- is not about to let Big Food off the hook. Every Happy Meal-type shenanigan just emboldens those who care about public health even more. And the general public is growing impatient with seeing such institutions flex disproportionate amounts of power in ways that hurt society collectively. The resilience and tenacity of the Occupy movement speak to this. When people band together in the name of a shared goal and decide they've had enough of something, history shows the underdog can absolutely prevail. Public health and community groups have proven this with tobacco, with childhood lead poisoning, with seat belt laws, etc. -- and we're adding the food environment to that list.

choice (1) health care (1) soda taxes (2) corporate social responsibility (1) nanny state (2) Newtown (1) Rachel Grana (1) social change (1) Connecticut shooting (1) marketing (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) food environment (1) environmental health (1) language (6) childhood trauma (3) diabetes prevention (1) sexual health (1) genital warts (1) Telluride (1) Sandy Hook (2) vaccines (1) water security (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) Bloomberg (3) news analysis (3) American Beverage Association (1) personal responsibility (3) health equity (10) obesity (10) news strategy (1) built environment (2) Donald Trump (2) PepsiCo (1) abortion (1) new year's resolutions (1) obesity prevention (1) cap the tap (1) social justice (1) FCC (1) sugary drinks (10) values (1) cosmetics (1) measure N (2) product safety (1) public health data (1) McDonald's (1) equity (3) Coca-Cola (3) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) paula deen (1) soda industry (4) naacp (1) media advocacy (21) SB 1000 (1) digital marketing (2) Penn State (3) Pine Ridge reservation (1) summer camps (1) authentic voices (1) Whiteclay (4) healthy eating (1) Black Lives Matter (1) news monitoring (1) food deserts (1) political correctness (1) democracy (1) water (1) cervical cancer (1) racism (1) Richmond (5) soda (12) diabetes (1) community safety (1) ACEs (2) seat belt laws (1) reproductive justice (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) junk food marketing to kids (2) framing (14) women's health (2) food industry (4) gatorade bolt game (1) food swamps (1) child sexual abuse (5) indoor smoking ban (1) industry appeals to choice (1) sexism (2) sexual violence (2) california (1) weight of the nation (1) auto safety (1) Chile (1) Amanda Fallin (1) Oglala Sioux (3) collaboration (1) community organizing (1) ssb (1) tobacco industry (2) race (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) Golden Gate Bridge (2) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) online marketing (1) food access (1) suicide prevention (2) default frame (1) childhood obesity (1) messaging (3) Wendy Davis (1) Michelle Obama (1) tobacco tax (1) safety (1) emergency contraception (1) youth (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) structural racism (1) prevention (1) San Francisco (3) El Monte (3) gun violence (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) Twitter (1) alcohol (5) government intrusion (1) sanitation (1) social media (2) community (1) Measure O (1) campaign finance (1) Joe Paterno (1) front groups (1) Bill Cosby (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) Texas (1) Colorado (1) chronic disease (2) snap (1) physical activity (1) violence prevention (8) news coverage (1) food justice (1) Catholic church (1) Citizens United (1) media analysis (5) junk food (2) sexual assault (1) sandusky (2) Happy Meals (1) Big Food (2) Big Soda (2) world water day (1) Proposition 47 (1) tobacco control (2) Tea Party (1) Aurora (1) SB 402 (1) journalism (1) prison system (1) community violence (1) elephant triggers (1) george lakoff (1) liana winett (1) apha (2) media (7) suicide nets (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) Merck (1) filibuster (1) tobacco (5) public health policy (2) news (2) Let's Move (1) food (1) social math (1) cancer prevention (1) inequities (1) paper tigers (1) election 2016 (1) gun control (2) autism (1) sports drinks (1) breastfeeding (3) Big Tobacco (3) children's health (3) junk food marketing (3) Nickelodeon (1) stigma (1) privilege (1) community health (1) SB-5 (1) target marketing (7) Sam Kass (1) cancer research (1) soda tax (11) food marketing (3) childhood adversity (1) regulation (2) communication (2) HPV vaccine (1) cigarette advertising (1) institutional accountability (1) beverage industry (2) violence (2) education (1) advocacy (3) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) Marion Nestle (1) prison phone calls (1) soda warning labels (1) Berkeley (2) gender (1) suicide barrier (2) Proposition 29 (1) food and beverage marketing (3) Gardasil (1) SSBs (1) mental health (2) public health (67) Dora the Explorer (1) beauty products (1) white house (1) media bites (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: