McDonald's says no to kids' health

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Last year, San Francisco passed a groundbreaking ordinance to require restaurants offering free toys in kids' meals to make sure that those meals met certain minimum -- and very reasonable -- nutrition requirements. Now, McDonald's has decided to sidestep the law and charge a dime for each of its Happy Meal toys so that it doesn't have to make the meals any healthier (read: less bad) for kids. The kicker: They're painting this as an act of charity and donating those dimes to the local Ronald McDonald House.

Lawyer and writer Michele Simon has taken the food giant to task for this stunt and questioned whether the 10-cent toy gimmick really is in full compliance with the law. And good for her for doing so. After all, this law was designed specifically to "disassociate toys from unhealthy food," as Simon put it.

But what if McDonald's is in full compliance? Then what? Are they in the clear? Do they get to go on with business as usual?

Hardly. Pressure is on from parents and advocates everywhere. They are holding McDonald's and other food and beverage companies responsible for the health harms that their products cause. Why? Because we have a health crisis in this country and food companies are unwilling to reign in their junk food marketing to help abate it. So, whether McDonald's actions are legal are not, the real issue here -- children's health -- should not get lost in the conversation.

Even as childhood obesity rates and related health problems continue to climb, McDonald's and other companies seem as insistent as ever on circumventing parents and marketing high-calorie, low-nutrition food and drinks to young kids. Research from Yale's Rudd Center on Food Policy and Obesity has showed that McDonald's is using online marketing to attract children and teens. And numerous case studies -- compiled by BMSG in partnership with the Center for Digital Democracy and National Policy & Legal Analysis Network to Prevent Childhood Obesity -- show that McDonald's is among many companies that use aggressive digital marketing to target youth and get them to engage and bond with brands.

What does all of this mean? First, it reaffirms what so many already know: that advocates, parents, policymakers and health professionals of all stripes have their work cut out for them. Big Food's gloves are off, and it will take continued action on the part of all of these groups to chip away at the power that allows them to continually flout health.

Second, it means that food and beverage companies have their work cut out for them too. Michele Simon is just one of many heavyweights in the public health arena who -- I think it's safe to say -- is not about to let Big Food off the hook. Every Happy Meal-type shenanigan just emboldens those who care about public health even more. And the general public is growing impatient with seeing such institutions flex disproportionate amounts of power in ways that hurt society collectively. The resilience and tenacity of the Occupy movement speak to this. When people band together in the name of a shared goal and decide they've had enough of something, history shows the underdog can absolutely prevail. Public health and community groups have proven this with tobacco, with childhood lead poisoning, with seat belt laws, etc. -- and we're adding the food environment to that list.

Coca-Cola (3) tobacco control (2) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) prevention (1) Nickelodeon (1) Sandy Hook (2) Dora the Explorer (1) product safety (1) stigma (1) Let's Move (1) apha (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) healthy eating (1) beauty products (1) corporate social responsibility (1) target marketing (5) prison phone calls (1) cosmetics (1) obesity prevention (1) digital marketing (2) media analysis (1) government intrusion (1) Bloomberg (3) media advocacy (13) American Beverage Association (1) El Monte (2) public health policy (1) obesity (9) Citizens United (1) cancer research (1) food (1) communication (2) inequities (1) naacp (1) Gardasil (1) food access (1) gun violence (1) suicide barrier (2) Big Tobacco (3) food and beverage marketing (3) seat belt laws (1) snap (1) Wendy Davis (1) water (1) indoor smoking ban (1) SB-5 (1) cervical cancer (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) beverage industry (1) breastfeeding (3) online marketing (1) food justice (1) social change (1) health equity (9) food deserts (1) messaging (2) soda (12) FCC (1) food industry (2) Happy Meals (1) public health (53) suicide prevention (2) advocacy (3) new year's resolutions (1) Penn State (3) elephant triggers (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) measure N (2) environmental health (1) SB 1000 (1) food environment (1) language (6) marketing (1) sandusky (2) community health (1) nanny state (2) auto safety (1) alcohol (4) built environment (2) cap the tap (1) sexual health (1) junk food (1) childhood obesity (1) gun control (2) collaboration (1) Texas (1) Chile (1) personal responsibility (2) reproductive justice (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) health care (1) McDonald's (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) Whiteclay (4) framing (9) Joe Paterno (1) SB 402 (1) paula deen (1) physical activity (1) Sam Kass (1) Proposition 29 (1) PepsiCo (1) mental health (2) tobacco tax (1) Oglala Sioux (3) media (3) Amanda Fallin (1) women's health (2) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) Catholic church (1) food swamps (1) privilege (1) choice (1) sexism (1) values (1) Connecticut shooting (1) Big Food (2) genital warts (1) ssb (1) white house (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) sugary drinks (6) media bites (1) Newtown (1) industry appeals to choice (1) autism (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) world water day (1) Richmond (4) soda tax (9) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) summer camps (1) children's health (3) sports drinks (1) soda warning labels (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) vaccines (1) liana winett (1) tobacco (4) institutional accountability (1) prison system (1) front groups (1) Big Soda (1) abortion (1) Measure O (1) equity (3) SSBs (1) Marion Nestle (1) Michelle Obama (1) suicide nets (1) Aurora (1) campaign finance (1) food marketing (3) San Francisco (2) Colorado (1) george lakoff (1) sanitation (1) soda industry (4) Berkeley (1) junk food marketing (3) gender (1) Rachel Grana (1) regulation (2) tobacco industry (2) water security (1) structural racism (1) child sexual abuse (5) news strategy (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) weight of the nation (1) cancer prevention (1) HPV vaccine (1) gatorade bolt game (1) cigarette advertising (1) social media (1) Merck (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (1) diabetes (1) Tea Party (1) social justice (1) chronic disease (2) california (1) violence prevention (6) filibuster (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: