McDonald's says no to kids' health

printer friendlyprinter friendly

Last year, San Francisco passed a groundbreaking ordinance to require restaurants offering free toys in kids' meals to make sure that those meals met certain minimum -- and very reasonable -- nutrition requirements. Now, McDonald's has decided to sidestep the law and charge a dime for each of its Happy Meal toys so that it doesn't have to make the meals any healthier (read: less bad) for kids. The kicker: They're painting this as an act of charity and donating those dimes to the local Ronald McDonald House.

Lawyer and writer Michele Simon has taken the food giant to task for this stunt and questioned whether the 10-cent toy gimmick really is in full compliance with the law. And good for her for doing so. After all, this law was designed specifically to "disassociate toys from unhealthy food," as Simon put it.

But what if McDonald's is in full compliance? Then what? Are they in the clear? Do they get to go on with business as usual?

Hardly. Pressure is on from parents and advocates everywhere. They are holding McDonald's and other food and beverage companies responsible for the health harms that their products cause. Why? Because we have a health crisis in this country and food companies are unwilling to reign in their junk food marketing to help abate it. So, whether McDonald's actions are legal are not, the real issue here -- children's health -- should not get lost in the conversation.

Even as childhood obesity rates and related health problems continue to climb, McDonald's and other companies seem as insistent as ever on circumventing parents and marketing high-calorie, low-nutrition food and drinks to young kids. Research from Yale's Rudd Center on Food Policy and Obesity has showed that McDonald's is using online marketing to attract children and teens. And numerous case studies -- compiled by BMSG in partnership with the Center for Digital Democracy and National Policy & Legal Analysis Network to Prevent Childhood Obesity -- show that McDonald's is among many companies that use aggressive digital marketing to target youth and get them to engage and bond with brands.

What does all of this mean? First, it reaffirms what so many already know: that advocates, parents, policymakers and health professionals of all stripes have their work cut out for them. Big Food's gloves are off, and it will take continued action on the part of all of these groups to chip away at the power that allows them to continually flout health.

Second, it means that food and beverage companies have their work cut out for them too. Michele Simon is just one of many heavyweights in the public health arena who -- I think it's safe to say -- is not about to let Big Food off the hook. Every Happy Meal-type shenanigan just emboldens those who care about public health even more. And the general public is growing impatient with seeing such institutions flex disproportionate amounts of power in ways that hurt society collectively. The resilience and tenacity of the Occupy movement speak to this. When people band together in the name of a shared goal and decide they've had enough of something, history shows the underdog can absolutely prevail. Public health and community groups have proven this with tobacco, with childhood lead poisoning, with seat belt laws, etc. -- and we're adding the food environment to that list.

news monitoring (1) alcohol (5) structural racism (1) health care (1) Nickelodeon (1) suicide nets (1) privilege (1) Wendy Davis (1) cancer research (1) vaccines (1) emergency contraception (1) San Francisco (3) Newtown (1) soda tax (11) cap the tap (1) mental health (2) SB-5 (1) collaboration (1) American Beverage Association (1) Dora the Explorer (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) prison system (1) violence prevention (8) children's health (3) advocacy (3) Aurora (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) sugary drinks (10) childhood adversity (1) diabetes prevention (1) language (6) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) choice (1) journalism (1) Tea Party (1) Catholic church (1) communication (2) food environment (1) youth (1) community safety (1) authentic voices (1) Big Soda (2) junk food marketing to kids (2) Connecticut shooting (1) Amanda Fallin (1) environmental health (1) online marketing (1) media advocacy (21) PepsiCo (1) sandusky (2) Johnson & Johnson (1) personal responsibility (3) Chile (1) digital marketing (2) white house (1) seat belt laws (1) diabetes (1) obesity (10) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) Donald Trump (2) messaging (3) media (7) social media (2) healthy eating (1) Bill Cosby (1) tobacco (5) education (1) new year's resolutions (1) beauty products (1) Sandy Hook (2) food and beverage marketing (3) Penn State (3) naacp (1) reproductive justice (1) chronic disease (2) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) soda taxes (2) community organizing (1) Coca-Cola (3) Proposition 47 (1) inequities (1) suicide barrier (2) Berkeley (2) gun violence (1) george lakoff (1) SSBs (1) women's health (2) Michelle Obama (1) product safety (1) Bloomberg (3) Measure O (1) water security (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) childhood obestiy conference (1) junk food marketing (3) El Monte (3) gatorade bolt game (1) framing (14) paula deen (1) McDonald's (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) violence (1) marketing (1) sexism (2) sexual violence (2) Proposition 29 (1) weight of the nation (1) regulation (2) SB 402 (1) cancer prevention (1) sports drinks (1) beverage industry (2) Oglala Sioux (3) food marketing (3) Twitter for advocacy (1) public health data (1) childhood trauma (3) Citizens United (1) news analysis (2) race (1) prison phone calls (1) water (1) food industry (4) media analysis (5) prevention (1) values (1) food access (1) cigarette advertising (1) racism (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) food deserts (1) soda warning labels (1) built environment (2) indoor smoking ban (1) measure N (2) obesity prevention (1) HPV vaccine (1) paper tigers (1) corporate social responsibility (1) Rachel Grana (1) filibuster (1) institutional accountability (1) Texas (1) community violence (1) social change (1) FCC (1) Twitter (1) news coverage (1) government intrusion (1) news (2) breastfeeding (3) nanny state (2) social justice (1) target marketing (7) california (1) health equity (10) snap (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) sexual health (1) default frame (1) soda (12) Let's Move (1) stigma (1) Colorado (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) news strategy (1) tobacco control (2) junk food (2) gun control (2) physical activity (1) Joe Paterno (1) tobacco tax (1) genital warts (1) Happy Meals (1) Whiteclay (4) autism (1) gender (1) Big Food (2) elephant triggers (1) sexual assault (1) apha (2) sanitation (1) community health (1) cervical cancer (1) election 2016 (1) media bites (1) Gardasil (1) democracy (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) soda industry (4) social math (1) equity (3) suicide prevention (2) political correctness (1) Telluride (1) food justice (1) campaign finance (1) Merck (1) auto safety (1) food (1) ssb (1) front groups (1) child sexual abuse (5) childhood obesity (1) SB 1000 (1) Sam Kass (1) Richmond (5) industry appeals to choice (1) world water day (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) ACEs (2) public health (66) tobacco industry (2) summer camps (1) liana winett (1) public health policy (2) Big Tobacco (3) cosmetics (1) Marion Nestle (1) abortion (1) food swamps (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: