Media oversimplify coverage of Aurora shooting

printer friendlyprinter friendly

In the wake of last week's shooting in Aurora, Colo., the news media have been filled with journalists, elected officials, and others bemoaning the rampage as "senseless" and "evil." On its face, this most recent rampage killing does seem senseless -- until you bring mental illness into the picture.

When people with severe, untreated mental illness are in the grip of paranoia, delusions, hallucinations and psychosis, they can be capable of doing any number of irrational and unreasonable things that are harmful to themselves or others. The likelihood that James Holmes may very well be suffering from severe mental illness, and have lost control of his rational mind, makes the shooting look less like an "evil," "diabolical" act, and a lot more like an incredibly sad tragedy born of an inadequate mental health safety net and easy access to deadly weapons.

When media coverage of these types of rampage killings focuses on the evil and depraved nature of the perpetrator, it precludes meaningful discussion about what can be done to prevent them from happening. Media coverage of Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper's comments is a case in point. Hickenlooper called James Holmes "warped," "twisted," a "creature," and portrayed the shooting as essentially inevitable: Such a "diabolical" person would have found a way to kill people even if weapons were harder to access. As BMSG discovered in past research on coverage of gun violence, this focus on the perpetrator is a common way that opponents of gun control argue against new gun policies.

In addition to minimizing the importance of gun control policies in preventing gun violence, this simplistic framing of the issue also ignores the essential role of mental health services. When people with severe mental illness are adequately treated, there is no evidence that they are any more violent than the general population. However, the mental health safety net in the United States is increasingly frayed and dysfunctional, incapable of preventing the types of tragedies that happened in Colorado.

It may make a good story to create a super-villain out of a deeply sick and disturbed young man, but villains and superheroes belong in movies, and the preventable causes of this rampage killing are all too real. We have a dismantled and crumbling mental health service system that consistently fails the mentally ill, their families, and the communities they live in. We have easy access to deadly assault weapons, vigorously defended by the companies that sell them. Add together an inadequate mental health safety net and assault rifles at every sporting goods store, and the tragedy of one family -- a son's descent into severe mental illness -- becomes the tragedy of many families.

It happened at Virginia Tech; it happened in Tuscon; it happened in Aurora; and calling it evil, saying that it is outside the bounds of human understanding, does nothing to open up a discussion of how to keep it from happening again.


Nickelodeon (1) tobacco industry (2) new year's resolutions (1) food marketing (3) auto safety (1) Proposition 47 (1) Texas (1) gun violence (1) elephant triggers (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) Donald Trump (2) Connecticut shooting (1) framing (14) tobacco (5) food access (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) cancer prevention (1) social change (1) Let's Move (1) white house (1) george lakoff (1) prison system (1) digital marketing (2) food justice (1) government intrusion (1) soda industry (4) San Francisco (3) sexual assault (1) naacp (1) election 2016 (1) SB 402 (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) marketing (1) racism (1) sexual health (1) summer camps (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) food deserts (1) soda tax (11) public health (66) Telluride (1) women's health (2) McDonald's (1) community health (1) california (1) Dora the Explorer (1) diabetes (1) Big Tobacco (3) Oglala Sioux (3) media (7) Aurora (1) gun control (2) Coca-Cola (3) journalism (1) soda (12) choice (1) obesity prevention (1) suicide prevention (2) genital warts (1) social math (1) HPV vaccine (1) education (1) sanitation (1) media bites (1) news (2) Tea Party (1) paper tigers (1) reproductive justice (1) El Monte (3) front groups (1) Berkeley (2) nanny state (2) political correctness (1) authentic voices (1) measure N (2) food swamps (1) online marketing (1) health care (1) cervical cancer (1) Bloomberg (3) Happy Meals (1) gatorade bolt game (1) food industry (4) paula deen (1) junk food marketing (3) campaign finance (1) world water day (1) physical activity (1) news analysis (2) suicide barrier (2) child sexual abuse (5) democracy (1) public health data (1) communication (2) default frame (1) junk food (2) Marion Nestle (1) Citizens United (1) social media (2) Jerry Sandusky (3) ACEs (2) mental health (2) tobacco control (2) language (6) community organizing (1) news monitoring (1) stigma (1) community safety (1) cancer research (1) Wendy Davis (1) children's health (3) beauty products (1) filibuster (1) alcohol (5) media advocacy (21) Newtown (1) FCC (1) sexism (2) water security (1) SSBs (1) Rachel Grana (1) snap (1) values (1) food environment (1) Chile (1) Sandy Hook (2) collaboration (1) race (1) equity (3) sports drinks (1) news coverage (1) Bill Cosby (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) Penn State (3) Catholic church (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) Gardasil (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) structural racism (1) media analysis (5) prevention (1) sexual violence (2) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) PepsiCo (1) food (1) water (1) Sam Kass (1) chronic disease (2) beverage industry (2) public health policy (2) indoor smoking ban (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) news strategy (1) health equity (10) regulation (2) abortion (1) weight of the nation (1) SB 1000 (1) built environment (2) gender (1) Measure O (1) cigarette advertising (1) violence (1) sugary drinks (10) vaccines (1) environmental health (1) institutional accountability (1) social justice (1) Whiteclay (4) Proposition 29 (1) industry appeals to choice (1) SB-5 (1) Big Food (2) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) childhood obesity (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) Big Soda (2) product safety (1) apha (2) emergency contraception (1) violence prevention (8) seat belt laws (1) ssb (1) autism (1) personal responsibility (3) Pine Ridge reservation (1) obesity (10) privilege (1) tobacco tax (1) Colorado (1) Richmond (5) suicide nets (1) diabetes prevention (1) cosmetics (1) soda taxes (2) cap the tap (1) corporate social responsibility (1) childhood adversity (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) sandusky (2) community violence (1) Twitter (1) Joe Paterno (1) childhood trauma (3) advocacy (3) inequities (1) American Beverage Association (1) youth (1) messaging (3) food and beverage marketing (3) Amanda Fallin (1) breastfeeding (3) Merck (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) target marketing (7) Michelle Obama (1) prison phone calls (1) soda warning labels (1) healthy eating (1) liana winett (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: