Media oversimplify coverage of Aurora shooting

printer friendlyprinter friendly

In the wake of last week's shooting in Aurora, Colo., the news media have been filled with journalists, elected officials, and others bemoaning the rampage as "senseless" and "evil." On its face, this most recent rampage killing does seem senseless -- until you bring mental illness into the picture.

When people with severe, untreated mental illness are in the grip of paranoia, delusions, hallucinations and psychosis, they can be capable of doing any number of irrational and unreasonable things that are harmful to themselves or others. The likelihood that James Holmes may very well be suffering from severe mental illness, and have lost control of his rational mind, makes the shooting look less like an "evil," "diabolical" act, and a lot more like an incredibly sad tragedy born of an inadequate mental health safety net and easy access to deadly weapons.

When media coverage of these types of rampage killings focuses on the evil and depraved nature of the perpetrator, it precludes meaningful discussion about what can be done to prevent them from happening. Media coverage of Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper's comments is a case in point. Hickenlooper called James Holmes "warped," "twisted," a "creature," and portrayed the shooting as essentially inevitable: Such a "diabolical" person would have found a way to kill people even if weapons were harder to access. As BMSG discovered in past research on coverage of gun violence, this focus on the perpetrator is a common way that opponents of gun control argue against new gun policies.

In addition to minimizing the importance of gun control policies in preventing gun violence, this simplistic framing of the issue also ignores the essential role of mental health services. When people with severe mental illness are adequately treated, there is no evidence that they are any more violent than the general population. However, the mental health safety net in the United States is increasingly frayed and dysfunctional, incapable of preventing the types of tragedies that happened in Colorado.

It may make a good story to create a super-villain out of a deeply sick and disturbed young man, but villains and superheroes belong in movies, and the preventable causes of this rampage killing are all too real. We have a dismantled and crumbling mental health service system that consistently fails the mentally ill, their families, and the communities they live in. We have easy access to deadly assault weapons, vigorously defended by the companies that sell them. Add together an inadequate mental health safety net and assault rifles at every sporting goods store, and the tragedy of one family -- a son's descent into severe mental illness -- becomes the tragedy of many families.

It happened at Virginia Tech; it happened in Tuscon; it happened in Aurora; and calling it evil, saying that it is outside the bounds of human understanding, does nothing to open up a discussion of how to keep it from happening again.


soda warning labels (1) Big Food (2) Whiteclay (4) Donald Trump (2) media analysis (6) McDonald's (1) soda (12) digital marketing (2) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) Black Lives Matter (1) news analysis (3) violence prevention (8) Oglala Sioux (3) education (1) snap (1) vaccines (1) messaging (3) adverse childhood experiences (3) gun control (2) summer camps (1) naacp (1) social media (2) democracy (1) campaign finance (1) equity (3) cancer prevention (1) Chile (1) social math (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) obesity (10) mental health (2) target marketing (8) food swamps (1) childhood obesity (1) FCC (1) Big Soda (2) Merck (1) election 2016 (1) measure N (2) food deserts (1) journalism (1) gender (1) Citizens United (1) Michelle Obama (1) racism (1) soda taxes (2) world water day (1) ssb (1) Marion Nestle (1) collaboration (1) media bites (1) community violence (1) emergency contraception (1) chronic disease (2) news (2) Berkeley (2) SB 402 (1) Newtown (1) values (1) abortion (1) framing (14) gatorade bolt game (1) news monitoring (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) Amanda Fallin (1) Nickelodeon (1) beauty products (1) Connecticut shooting (1) cancer research (1) violence (2) reproductive justice (1) tobacco (5) Colorado (1) sexual health (1) health care (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) cap the tap (1) San Francisco (3) social justice (2) Sandy Hook (2) childhood adversity (1) tobacco tax (1) cigarette advertising (1) community health (1) youth (1) government intrusion (1) alcohol (5) community safety (1) diabetes prevention (1) PepsiCo (1) food justice (1) SSBs (1) child sexual abuse (5) cosmetics (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) tobacco industry (2) media (7) institutional accountability (1) Let's Move (1) sanitation (1) paula deen (1) cannes lions festival (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) junk food (2) nanny state (2) sports drinks (1) suicide nets (1) autism (1) American Beverage Association (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) inequities (1) Texas (1) food (1) media advocacy (23) stigma (1) Richmond (5) community organizing (1) children's health (3) social change (1) food and beverage marketing (3) race (1) Catholic church (1) communication strategy (1) genital warts (1) personal responsibility (3) Joe Paterno (1) physical activity (1) structural racism (1) Proposition 29 (1) built environment (2) Golden Gate Bridge (2) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) Measure O (1) nonprofit communications (1) privilege (1) prevention (1) suicide prevention (2) public health (70) sexual assault (1) water (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) liana winett (1) food industry (4) news coverage (1) ACEs (2) sexual violence (2) communication (2) cervical cancer (1) public health policy (2) sexism (2) language (6) environmental health (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) water security (1) Rachel Grana (1) prison system (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) Coca-Cola (3) marketing (1) Gardasil (1) white house (1) suicide barrier (2) sandusky (2) Sam Kass (1) food access (1) Bill Cosby (1) Tea Party (1) auto safety (1) childhood trauma (3) Twitter (1) SB 1000 (1) breastfeeding (3) political correctness (1) weight of the nation (1) soda tax (11) prison phone calls (1) seat belt laws (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) industry appeals to choice (1) gun violence (1) Dora the Explorer (1) safety (1) beverage industry (2) choice (1) online marketing (1) advocacy (3) El Monte (3) junk food marketing (4) Oakland Unified School District (1) apha (3) obesity prevention (1) diabetes (1) george lakoff (1) paper tigers (1) new year's resolutions (1) california (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) food marketing (4) community (1) Big Tobacco (3) Telluride (1) soda industry (4) women's health (2) product safety (1) HPV vaccine (1) Wendy Davis (1) Happy Meals (1) Bloomberg (3) indoor smoking ban (1) sugary drinks (10) corporate social responsibility (1) elephant triggers (1) front groups (1) food environment (1) Proposition 47 (1) news strategy (1) regulation (2) Penn State (3) default frame (1) authentic voices (1) Aurora (1) filibuster (1) health equity (10) tobacco control (2) public health data (1) strategic communication (1) SB-5 (1) healthy eating (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: