Media oversimplify coverage of Aurora shooting

printer friendlyprinter friendly

In the wake of last week's shooting in Aurora, Colo., the news media have been filled with journalists, elected officials, and others bemoaning the rampage as "senseless" and "evil." On its face, this most recent rampage killing does seem senseless -- until you bring mental illness into the picture.

When people with severe, untreated mental illness are in the grip of paranoia, delusions, hallucinations and psychosis, they can be capable of doing any number of irrational and unreasonable things that are harmful to themselves or others. The likelihood that James Holmes may very well be suffering from severe mental illness, and have lost control of his rational mind, makes the shooting look less like an "evil," "diabolical" act, and a lot more like an incredibly sad tragedy born of an inadequate mental health safety net and easy access to deadly weapons.

When media coverage of these types of rampage killings focuses on the evil and depraved nature of the perpetrator, it precludes meaningful discussion about what can be done to prevent them from happening. Media coverage of Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper's comments is a case in point. Hickenlooper called James Holmes "warped," "twisted," a "creature," and portrayed the shooting as essentially inevitable: Such a "diabolical" person would have found a way to kill people even if weapons were harder to access. As BMSG discovered in past research on coverage of gun violence, this focus on the perpetrator is a common way that opponents of gun control argue against new gun policies.

In addition to minimizing the importance of gun control policies in preventing gun violence, this simplistic framing of the issue also ignores the essential role of mental health services. When people with severe mental illness are adequately treated, there is no evidence that they are any more violent than the general population. However, the mental health safety net in the United States is increasingly frayed and dysfunctional, incapable of preventing the types of tragedies that happened in Colorado.

It may make a good story to create a super-villain out of a deeply sick and disturbed young man, but villains and superheroes belong in movies, and the preventable causes of this rampage killing are all too real. We have a dismantled and crumbling mental health service system that consistently fails the mentally ill, their families, and the communities they live in. We have easy access to deadly assault weapons, vigorously defended by the companies that sell them. Add together an inadequate mental health safety net and assault rifles at every sporting goods store, and the tragedy of one family -- a son's descent into severe mental illness -- becomes the tragedy of many families.

It happened at Virginia Tech; it happened in Tuscon; it happened in Aurora; and calling it evil, saying that it is outside the bounds of human understanding, does nothing to open up a discussion of how to keep it from happening again.


Sam Kass (1) Measure O (1) snap (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) McDonald's (1) water (1) SB 402 (1) children's health (3) new year's resolutions (1) media (4) food deserts (1) women's health (2) social media (1) ssb (1) collaboration (1) filibuster (1) race (1) auto safety (1) FCC (1) obesity prevention (1) campaign finance (1) chronic disease (2) sandusky (2) prevention (1) advocacy (3) environmental health (1) Penn State (3) childhood obesity (1) child sexual abuse (5) abortion (1) soda warning labels (1) stigma (1) Texas (1) apha (1) prison phone calls (1) tobacco control (2) Richmond (5) food swamps (1) industry appeals to choice (1) suicide prevention (2) El Monte (3) weight of the nation (1) Oglala Sioux (3) elephant triggers (1) Bloomberg (3) cigarette advertising (1) seat belt laws (1) sports drinks (1) reproductive justice (1) soda tax (10) Pine Ridge reservation (1) autism (1) Connecticut shooting (1) Big Soda (2) Marion Nestle (1) alcohol (4) language (6) Telluride (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) personal responsibility (2) gun violence (1) sanitation (1) genital warts (1) indoor smoking ban (1) SB 1000 (1) Dora the Explorer (1) tobacco (4) choice (1) Sandy Hook (2) water security (1) framing (9) food industry (2) SSBs (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) food access (1) violence (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) junk food marketing (3) california (1) healthy eating (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) summer camps (1) social change (1) regulation (2) Rachel Grana (1) community health (1) health care (1) violence prevention (6) food (1) communication (2) sexual assault (1) white house (1) physical activity (1) soda industry (4) obesity (9) Wendy Davis (1) naacp (1) media analysis (2) childhood lead poisoning (1) Aurora (1) gender (1) cancer prevention (1) suicide nets (1) food and beverage marketing (3) Nickelodeon (1) Big Food (2) Merck (1) diabetes (1) tobacco industry (2) sexism (1) food justice (1) sexual health (1) food marketing (3) marketing (1) media advocacy (15) Catholic church (1) cancer research (1) Coca-Cola (3) Amanda Fallin (1) breastfeeding (3) front groups (1) gun control (2) nanny state (2) Chile (1) San Francisco (3) equity (3) sugar-sweetened beverages (1) Michelle Obama (1) sexual violence (1) Let's Move (1) soda (12) values (1) health equity (9) cap the tap (1) youth (1) beverage industry (1) liana winett (1) Tea Party (1) news strategy (1) digital marketing (2) paula deen (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) structural racism (1) Proposition 29 (1) beauty products (1) news coverage (1) social justice (1) corporate social responsibility (1) American Beverage Association (1) gatorade bolt game (1) Bill Cosby (1) world water day (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) george lakoff (1) Joe Paterno (1) target marketing (5) Gardasil (1) Berkeley (2) measure N (2) Newtown (1) Citizens United (1) Whiteclay (4) vaccines (1) public health (55) junk food (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) HPV vaccine (1) messaging (2) SB-5 (1) built environment (2) inequities (1) Happy Meals (1) institutional accountability (1) food environment (1) Big Tobacco (3) suicide barrier (2) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) cervical cancer (1) government intrusion (1) tobacco tax (1) public health policy (1) cosmetics (1) mental health (2) privilege (1) prison system (1) product safety (1) media bites (1) sugary drinks (6) Colorado (1) online marketing (1) PepsiCo (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: