Media oversimplify coverage of Aurora shooting

printer friendlyprinter friendly

In the wake of last week's shooting in Aurora, Colo., the news media have been filled with journalists, elected officials, and others bemoaning the rampage as "senseless" and "evil." On its face, this most recent rampage killing does seem senseless -- until you bring mental illness into the picture.

When people with severe, untreated mental illness are in the grip of paranoia, delusions, hallucinations and psychosis, they can be capable of doing any number of irrational and unreasonable things that are harmful to themselves or others. The likelihood that James Holmes may very well be suffering from severe mental illness, and have lost control of his rational mind, makes the shooting look less like an "evil," "diabolical" act, and a lot more like an incredibly sad tragedy born of an inadequate mental health safety net and easy access to deadly weapons.

When media coverage of these types of rampage killings focuses on the evil and depraved nature of the perpetrator, it precludes meaningful discussion about what can be done to prevent them from happening. Media coverage of Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper's comments is a case in point. Hickenlooper called James Holmes "warped," "twisted," a "creature," and portrayed the shooting as essentially inevitable: Such a "diabolical" person would have found a way to kill people even if weapons were harder to access. As BMSG discovered in past research on coverage of gun violence, this focus on the perpetrator is a common way that opponents of gun control argue against new gun policies.

In addition to minimizing the importance of gun control policies in preventing gun violence, this simplistic framing of the issue also ignores the essential role of mental health services. When people with severe mental illness are adequately treated, there is no evidence that they are any more violent than the general population. However, the mental health safety net in the United States is increasingly frayed and dysfunctional, incapable of preventing the types of tragedies that happened in Colorado.

It may make a good story to create a super-villain out of a deeply sick and disturbed young man, but villains and superheroes belong in movies, and the preventable causes of this rampage killing are all too real. We have a dismantled and crumbling mental health service system that consistently fails the mentally ill, their families, and the communities they live in. We have easy access to deadly assault weapons, vigorously defended by the companies that sell them. Add together an inadequate mental health safety net and assault rifles at every sporting goods store, and the tragedy of one family -- a son's descent into severe mental illness -- becomes the tragedy of many families.

It happened at Virginia Tech; it happened in Tuscon; it happened in Aurora; and calling it evil, saying that it is outside the bounds of human understanding, does nothing to open up a discussion of how to keep it from happening again.


violence (2) Richmond (5) education (1) McDonald's (1) seat belt laws (1) tobacco tax (1) Berkeley (2) Catholic church (1) Citizens United (1) mental health (2) vaccines (1) default frame (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) El Monte (3) beauty products (1) diabetes prevention (1) new year's resolutions (1) media advocacy (23) breastfeeding (3) alcohol (5) social media (2) water (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) social math (1) elephant triggers (1) health equity (10) race (1) Wendy Davis (1) indoor smoking ban (1) summer camps (1) soda (12) HPV vaccine (1) Gardasil (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) Happy Meals (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) paula deen (1) Chile (1) media analysis (6) measure N (2) Joe Paterno (1) apha (3) suicide nets (1) regulation (2) strategic communication (1) white house (1) gatorade bolt game (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) advocacy (3) emergency contraception (1) Dora the Explorer (1) equity (3) personal responsibility (3) nonprofit communications (1) online marketing (1) auto safety (1) weight of the nation (1) suicide prevention (2) media bites (1) Colorado (1) news coverage (1) cosmetics (1) San Francisco (3) food swamps (1) news analysis (3) junk food marketing to kids (2) Donald Trump (2) cancer prevention (1) paper tigers (1) food environment (1) SB 402 (1) george lakoff (1) obesity prevention (1) cervical cancer (1) nanny state (2) corporate social responsibility (1) beverage industry (2) adverse childhood experiences (3) obesity (10) industry appeals to choice (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) diabetes (1) Black Lives Matter (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) social justice (2) abortion (1) Marion Nestle (1) government intrusion (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) Oglala Sioux (3) safety (1) genital warts (1) snap (1) SB 1000 (1) suicide barrier (2) Let's Move (1) American Beverage Association (1) public health policy (2) women's health (2) tobacco industry (2) democracy (1) Merck (1) campaign finance (1) racism (1) FCC (1) Big Soda (2) Tea Party (1) food and beverage marketing (3) PepsiCo (1) structural racism (1) sexual violence (2) Amanda Fallin (1) junk food (2) tobacco (5) reproductive justice (1) journalism (1) Rachel Grana (1) sexual assault (1) prevention (1) Michelle Obama (1) water security (1) Sam Kass (1) built environment (2) Big Tobacco (3) california (1) naacp (1) childhood obesity (1) collaboration (1) junk food marketing (4) social change (1) cigarette advertising (1) communication (2) cancer research (1) cap the tap (1) children's health (3) news (2) Nickelodeon (1) food deserts (1) food industry (4) cannes lions festival (1) prison system (1) filibuster (1) institutional accountability (1) sanitation (1) Bill Cosby (1) ACEs (2) digital marketing (2) public health data (1) Texas (1) environmental health (1) communication strategy (1) stigma (1) Sandy Hook (2) prison phone calls (1) sexism (2) gun violence (1) childhood adversity (1) ssb (1) tobacco control (2) physical activity (1) SSBs (1) SB-5 (1) Penn State (3) soda taxes (2) Whiteclay (4) Proposition 29 (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) Bloomberg (3) gender (1) chronic disease (2) Telluride (1) violence prevention (8) food marketing (4) target marketing (8) Coca-Cola (3) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) sports drinks (1) front groups (1) Proposition 47 (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) Newtown (1) soda tax (11) Big Food (2) sexual health (1) public health (70) Measure O (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) autism (1) community safety (1) values (1) choice (1) soda warning labels (1) Twitter (1) food access (1) child sexual abuse (5) world water day (1) framing (14) liana winett (1) community organizing (1) Aurora (1) product safety (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) messaging (3) food (1) food justice (1) community violence (1) media (7) political correctness (1) gun control (2) soda industry (4) language (6) sandusky (2) youth (1) healthy eating (1) authentic voices (1) community health (1) inequities (1) Connecticut shooting (1) marketing (1) news monitoring (1) childhood trauma (3) community (1) privilege (1) health care (1) news strategy (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) sugary drinks (10) election 2016 (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: