Media oversimplify coverage of Aurora shooting

printer friendlyprinter friendly

In the wake of last week's shooting in Aurora, Colo., the news media have been filled with journalists, elected officials, and others bemoaning the rampage as "senseless" and "evil." On its face, this most recent rampage killing does seem senseless -- until you bring mental illness into the picture.

When people with severe, untreated mental illness are in the grip of paranoia, delusions, hallucinations and psychosis, they can be capable of doing any number of irrational and unreasonable things that are harmful to themselves or others. The likelihood that James Holmes may very well be suffering from severe mental illness, and have lost control of his rational mind, makes the shooting look less like an "evil," "diabolical" act, and a lot more like an incredibly sad tragedy born of an inadequate mental health safety net and easy access to deadly weapons.

When media coverage of these types of rampage killings focuses on the evil and depraved nature of the perpetrator, it precludes meaningful discussion about what can be done to prevent them from happening. Media coverage of Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper's comments is a case in point. Hickenlooper called James Holmes "warped," "twisted," a "creature," and portrayed the shooting as essentially inevitable: Such a "diabolical" person would have found a way to kill people even if weapons were harder to access. As BMSG discovered in past research on coverage of gun violence, this focus on the perpetrator is a common way that opponents of gun control argue against new gun policies.

In addition to minimizing the importance of gun control policies in preventing gun violence, this simplistic framing of the issue also ignores the essential role of mental health services. When people with severe mental illness are adequately treated, there is no evidence that they are any more violent than the general population. However, the mental health safety net in the United States is increasingly frayed and dysfunctional, incapable of preventing the types of tragedies that happened in Colorado.

It may make a good story to create a super-villain out of a deeply sick and disturbed young man, but villains and superheroes belong in movies, and the preventable causes of this rampage killing are all too real. We have a dismantled and crumbling mental health service system that consistently fails the mentally ill, their families, and the communities they live in. We have easy access to deadly assault weapons, vigorously defended by the companies that sell them. Add together an inadequate mental health safety net and assault rifles at every sporting goods store, and the tragedy of one family -- a son's descent into severe mental illness -- becomes the tragedy of many families.

It happened at Virginia Tech; it happened in Tuscon; it happened in Aurora; and calling it evil, saying that it is outside the bounds of human understanding, does nothing to open up a discussion of how to keep it from happening again.


cosmetics (1) news (2) racism (1) SB 1000 (1) ACEs (2) government intrusion (1) Dora the Explorer (1) SSBs (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) water security (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) election 2016 (1) community organizing (1) Richmond (5) Let's Move (1) Oglala Sioux (3) built environment (2) cancer prevention (1) language (6) cigarette advertising (1) genital warts (1) childhood obesity (1) tobacco control (2) stigma (1) cervical cancer (1) community violence (1) vaccines (1) collaboration (1) product safety (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) reproductive justice (1) indoor smoking ban (1) regulation (2) sexual assault (1) youth (1) media advocacy (21) corporate social responsibility (1) soda (12) Connecticut shooting (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) front groups (1) news analysis (3) communication (2) food (1) summer camps (1) gatorade bolt game (1) political correctness (1) Big Food (2) equity (3) FCC (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) beverage industry (2) naacp (1) HPV vaccine (1) food access (1) physical activity (1) public health (67) environmental health (1) alcohol (5) news monitoring (1) Telluride (1) health equity (10) Happy Meals (1) Nickelodeon (1) autism (1) Merck (1) liana winett (1) food marketing (3) violence (2) advocacy (3) food deserts (1) soda tax (11) framing (14) sanitation (1) childhood adversity (1) social math (1) Colorado (1) cancer research (1) abortion (1) El Monte (3) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) news strategy (1) Big Tobacco (3) breastfeeding (3) gun control (2) mental health (2) prevention (1) gun violence (1) child sexual abuse (5) PepsiCo (1) public health data (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) campaign finance (1) new year's resolutions (1) Newtown (1) institutional accountability (1) Aurora (1) journalism (1) digital marketing (2) American Beverage Association (1) suicide nets (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) Berkeley (2) SB 402 (1) cap the tap (1) george lakoff (1) Donald Trump (2) McDonald's (1) marketing (1) junk food marketing (3) women's health (2) soda taxes (2) Joe Paterno (1) nanny state (2) media analysis (5) world water day (1) apha (2) tobacco (5) authentic voices (1) safety (1) food justice (1) sexual violence (2) childhood obestiy conference (1) messaging (3) Measure O (1) inequities (1) paula deen (1) obesity prevention (1) Gardasil (1) sexual health (1) prison phone calls (1) Big Soda (2) Michelle Obama (1) Citizens United (1) filibuster (1) Amanda Fallin (1) structural racism (1) healthy eating (1) Texas (1) values (1) Proposition 29 (1) Coca-Cola (3) health care (1) soda warning labels (1) auto safety (1) tobacco industry (2) SB-5 (1) Proposition 47 (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) ssb (1) suicide prevention (2) Whiteclay (4) gender (1) Tea Party (1) community (1) food swamps (1) social justice (1) Bloomberg (3) diabetes prevention (1) elephant triggers (1) Twitter (1) soda industry (4) Wendy Davis (1) california (1) public health policy (2) Sam Kass (1) seat belt laws (1) food environment (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) beauty products (1) junk food (2) privilege (1) Marion Nestle (1) diabetes (1) Black Lives Matter (1) race (1) obesity (10) choice (1) tobacco tax (1) media bites (1) community health (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) Bill Cosby (1) sexism (2) Oakland Unified School District (1) social change (1) personal responsibility (3) community safety (1) social media (2) media (7) education (1) chronic disease (2) Twitter for advocacy (1) democracy (1) Sandy Hook (2) childhood lead poisoning (1) sugary drinks (10) emergency contraception (1) children's health (3) food industry (4) food and beverage marketing (3) measure N (2) white house (1) target marketing (7) online marketing (1) Chile (1) suicide barrier (2) prison system (1) weight of the nation (1) paper tigers (1) water (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) violence prevention (8) sandusky (2) childhood trauma (3) industry appeals to choice (1) Rachel Grana (1) San Francisco (3) Catholic church (1) default frame (1) news coverage (1) sports drinks (1) Penn State (3) snap (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: