Media oversimplify coverage of Aurora shooting

printer friendlyprinter friendly

In the wake of last week's shooting in Aurora, Colo., the news media have been filled with journalists, elected officials, and others bemoaning the rampage as "senseless" and "evil." On its face, this most recent rampage killing does seem senseless -- until you bring mental illness into the picture.

When people with severe, untreated mental illness are in the grip of paranoia, delusions, hallucinations and psychosis, they can be capable of doing any number of irrational and unreasonable things that are harmful to themselves or others. The likelihood that James Holmes may very well be suffering from severe mental illness, and have lost control of his rational mind, makes the shooting look less like an "evil," "diabolical" act, and a lot more like an incredibly sad tragedy born of an inadequate mental health safety net and easy access to deadly weapons.

When media coverage of these types of rampage killings focuses on the evil and depraved nature of the perpetrator, it precludes meaningful discussion about what can be done to prevent them from happening. Media coverage of Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper's comments is a case in point. Hickenlooper called James Holmes "warped," "twisted," a "creature," and portrayed the shooting as essentially inevitable: Such a "diabolical" person would have found a way to kill people even if weapons were harder to access. As BMSG discovered in past research on coverage of gun violence, this focus on the perpetrator is a common way that opponents of gun control argue against new gun policies.

In addition to minimizing the importance of gun control policies in preventing gun violence, this simplistic framing of the issue also ignores the essential role of mental health services. When people with severe mental illness are adequately treated, there is no evidence that they are any more violent than the general population. However, the mental health safety net in the United States is increasingly frayed and dysfunctional, incapable of preventing the types of tragedies that happened in Colorado.

It may make a good story to create a super-villain out of a deeply sick and disturbed young man, but villains and superheroes belong in movies, and the preventable causes of this rampage killing are all too real. We have a dismantled and crumbling mental health service system that consistently fails the mentally ill, their families, and the communities they live in. We have easy access to deadly assault weapons, vigorously defended by the companies that sell them. Add together an inadequate mental health safety net and assault rifles at every sporting goods store, and the tragedy of one family -- a son's descent into severe mental illness -- becomes the tragedy of many families.

It happened at Virginia Tech; it happened in Tuscon; it happened in Aurora; and calling it evil, saying that it is outside the bounds of human understanding, does nothing to open up a discussion of how to keep it from happening again.

Sam Kass (1) tobacco control (2) media (4) nanny state (2) race (1) auto safety (1) PepsiCo (1) social media (1) elephant triggers (1) Proposition 29 (1) paula deen (1) SB 1000 (1) Tea Party (1) george lakoff (1) FCC (1) cosmetics (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) Citizens United (1) genital warts (1) equity (3) prevention (1) autism (1) Marion Nestle (1) environmental health (1) soda warning labels (1) cancer prevention (1) abortion (1) SSBs (1) San Francisco (3) Happy Meals (1) marketing (1) SB 402 (1) food industry (2) privilege (1) corporate social responsibility (1) breastfeeding (3) Wendy Davis (1) gun control (2) Penn State (3) media advocacy (15) beverage industry (1) public health (55) Twitter for advocacy (1) obesity (9) sexual health (1) soda tax (10) suicide nets (1) chronic disease (2) Bloomberg (3) naacp (1) Colorado (1) healthy eating (1) beauty products (1) Let's Move (1) gun violence (1) personal responsibility (2) child sexual abuse (5) Coca-Cola (3) apha (1) tobacco (4) Pine Ridge reservation (1) health equity (9) violence prevention (6) stigma (1) built environment (2) Nickelodeon (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) soda (12) youth (1) food justice (1) food access (1) institutional accountability (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) Merck (1) physical activity (1) Dora the Explorer (1) cap the tap (1) white house (1) indoor smoking ban (1) prison phone calls (1) new year's resolutions (1) Bill Cosby (1) campaign finance (1) Joe Paterno (1) water (1) ssb (1) seat belt laws (1) filibuster (1) structural racism (1) Chile (1) obesity prevention (1) news coverage (1) regulation (2) liana winett (1) sexual assault (1) california (1) framing (9) tobacco industry (2) soda industry (4) mental health (2) junk food marketing to kids (2) gatorade bolt game (1) childhood obesity (1) Big Tobacco (3) Johnson & Johnson (1) Measure O (1) Big Soda (2) gender (1) government intrusion (1) inequities (1) food deserts (1) media bites (1) measure N (2) snap (1) language (6) reproductive justice (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) messaging (2) diabetes (1) advocacy (3) food and beverage marketing (3) Telluride (1) water security (1) digital marketing (2) sanitation (1) Connecticut shooting (1) prison system (1) Michelle Obama (1) cervical cancer (1) choice (1) world water day (1) food swamps (1) tobacco tax (1) news strategy (1) Texas (1) weight of the nation (1) front groups (1) media analysis (2) food environment (1) social justice (1) suicide barrier (2) vaccines (1) children's health (3) Gardasil (1) suicide prevention (2) McDonald's (1) public health policy (1) Aurora (1) SB-5 (1) alcohol (4) El Monte (3) target marketing (5) junk food marketing (3) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) sports drinks (1) sexual violence (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (1) values (1) women's health (2) Rachel Grana (1) collaboration (1) violence (1) Amanda Fallin (1) communication (2) Oglala Sioux (3) community health (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) food (1) Catholic church (1) cigarette advertising (1) Whiteclay (4) social change (1) sexism (1) Newtown (1) Berkeley (2) sandusky (2) junk food (1) health care (1) Sandy Hook (2) sugary drinks (6) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) summer camps (1) HPV vaccine (1) online marketing (1) food marketing (3) Big Food (2) industry appeals to choice (1) Richmond (5) American Beverage Association (1) product safety (1) cancer research (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: