Media oversimplify coverage of Aurora shooting

printer friendlyprinter friendly

In the wake of last week's shooting in Aurora, Colo., the news media have been filled with journalists, elected officials, and others bemoaning the rampage as "senseless" and "evil." On its face, this most recent rampage killing does seem senseless -- until you bring mental illness into the picture.

When people with severe, untreated mental illness are in the grip of paranoia, delusions, hallucinations and psychosis, they can be capable of doing any number of irrational and unreasonable things that are harmful to themselves or others. The likelihood that James Holmes may very well be suffering from severe mental illness, and have lost control of his rational mind, makes the shooting look less like an "evil," "diabolical" act, and a lot more like an incredibly sad tragedy born of an inadequate mental health safety net and easy access to deadly weapons.

When media coverage of these types of rampage killings focuses on the evil and depraved nature of the perpetrator, it precludes meaningful discussion about what can be done to prevent them from happening. Media coverage of Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper's comments is a case in point. Hickenlooper called James Holmes "warped," "twisted," a "creature," and portrayed the shooting as essentially inevitable: Such a "diabolical" person would have found a way to kill people even if weapons were harder to access. As BMSG discovered in past research on coverage of gun violence, this focus on the perpetrator is a common way that opponents of gun control argue against new gun policies.

In addition to minimizing the importance of gun control policies in preventing gun violence, this simplistic framing of the issue also ignores the essential role of mental health services. When people with severe mental illness are adequately treated, there is no evidence that they are any more violent than the general population. However, the mental health safety net in the United States is increasingly frayed and dysfunctional, incapable of preventing the types of tragedies that happened in Colorado.

It may make a good story to create a super-villain out of a deeply sick and disturbed young man, but villains and superheroes belong in movies, and the preventable causes of this rampage killing are all too real. We have a dismantled and crumbling mental health service system that consistently fails the mentally ill, their families, and the communities they live in. We have easy access to deadly assault weapons, vigorously defended by the companies that sell them. Add together an inadequate mental health safety net and assault rifles at every sporting goods store, and the tragedy of one family -- a son's descent into severe mental illness -- becomes the tragedy of many families.

It happened at Virginia Tech; it happened in Tuscon; it happened in Aurora; and calling it evil, saying that it is outside the bounds of human understanding, does nothing to open up a discussion of how to keep it from happening again.


Texas (1) media bites (1) social media (2) privilege (1) campaign finance (1) environmental health (1) structural racism (1) Big Soda (2) autism (1) political correctness (1) Gardasil (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) community (1) beauty products (1) public health (71) liana winett (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) collaboration (1) Sam Kass (1) naacp (1) Let's Move (1) prevention (1) sports drinks (1) youth (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) Twitter (1) violence prevention (8) obesity (10) social justice (2) beverage industry (2) default frame (1) HPV vaccine (1) tobacco (5) women's health (2) FCC (1) food industry (4) regulation (2) Citizens United (1) communication (2) adverse childhood experiences (3) healthy eating (1) communication strategy (1) childhood adversity (1) obesity prevention (1) Aurora (1) reproductive justice (1) stigma (1) snap (1) news strategy (1) food access (1) advocacy (3) language (6) Big Tobacco (3) sandusky (2) social math (1) Amanda Fallin (1) Donald Trump (2) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) child sexual abuse (5) Richmond (5) california (1) food environment (1) Catholic church (1) cancer prevention (1) Big Food (2) sexual assault (1) public health data (1) democracy (1) gun control (2) Chile (1) abortion (1) Whiteclay (4) Berkeley (2) personal responsibility (3) suicide nets (1) election 2016 (1) cap the tap (1) community safety (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) Rachel Grana (1) elephant triggers (1) industry appeals to choice (1) Telluride (1) sexual health (1) vaccines (1) safety (1) institutional accountability (1) food marketing (5) target marketing (9) Jerry Sandusky (3) online marketing (1) choice (1) ssb (1) alcohol (5) sugary drinks (10) soda industry (4) soda taxes (2) emergency contraception (1) Penn State (3) soda (12) SB 1000 (1) world water day (1) sanitation (1) cigarette advertising (1) social change (1) food justice (1) media (7) food deserts (1) strategic communication (1) Michelle Obama (1) soda warning labels (1) PepsiCo (1) media analysis (6) indoor smoking ban (1) Joe Paterno (1) Tea Party (1) sexual violence (2) public health policy (2) new year's resolutions (1) junk food (2) SB 402 (1) mental health (2) gatorade bolt game (1) prison system (1) SB-5 (1) tobacco control (2) measure N (2) physical activity (1) San Francisco (3) prison phone calls (1) Wendy Davis (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) tobacco industry (2) white house (1) water security (1) Proposition 47 (1) Proposition 29 (1) suicide prevention (2) product safety (1) apha (3) health equity (10) weight of the nation (1) education (1) cannes lions festival (1) front groups (1) paula deen (1) george lakoff (1) Bloomberg (3) news (2) McDonald's (1) values (1) Black Lives Matter (1) journalism (1) Bill Cosby (1) diabetes (1) Colorado (1) American Beverage Association (1) news analysis (3) sexism (2) Coca-Cola (3) Sandy Hook (2) nanny state (2) water (1) cervical cancer (1) framing (14) community organizing (1) authentic voices (1) childhood obesity (1) Newtown (1) cancer research (1) soda tax (11) ACEs (2) children's health (3) health care (1) Happy Meals (1) seat belt laws (1) messaging (3) Marion Nestle (1) Measure O (1) food and beverage marketing (3) cosmetics (1) Oglala Sioux (3) SSBs (1) media advocacy (23) junk food marketing (4) paper tigers (1) filibuster (1) news monitoring (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) racism (1) food (1) breastfeeding (3) corporate social responsibility (1) genital warts (1) community health (1) built environment (2) nonprofit communications (1) news coverage (1) equity (3) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) inequities (1) El Monte (3) violence (2) suicide barrier (2) food swamps (1) marketing (1) race (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) community violence (1) auto safety (1) Dora the Explorer (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) diabetes prevention (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) Nickelodeon (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) tobacco tax (1) government intrusion (1) childhood trauma (3) gun violence (1) Merck (1) Connecticut shooting (1) summer camps (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) gender (1) digital marketing (3) chronic disease (2)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: