Media oversimplify coverage of Aurora shooting

printer friendlyprinter friendly

In the wake of last week's shooting in Aurora, Colo., the news media have been filled with journalists, elected officials, and others bemoaning the rampage as "senseless" and "evil." On its face, this most recent rampage killing does seem senseless -- until you bring mental illness into the picture.

When people with severe, untreated mental illness are in the grip of paranoia, delusions, hallucinations and psychosis, they can be capable of doing any number of irrational and unreasonable things that are harmful to themselves or others. The likelihood that James Holmes may very well be suffering from severe mental illness, and have lost control of his rational mind, makes the shooting look less like an "evil," "diabolical" act, and a lot more like an incredibly sad tragedy born of an inadequate mental health safety net and easy access to deadly weapons.

When media coverage of these types of rampage killings focuses on the evil and depraved nature of the perpetrator, it precludes meaningful discussion about what can be done to prevent them from happening. Media coverage of Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper's comments is a case in point. Hickenlooper called James Holmes "warped," "twisted," a "creature," and portrayed the shooting as essentially inevitable: Such a "diabolical" person would have found a way to kill people even if weapons were harder to access. As BMSG discovered in past research on coverage of gun violence, this focus on the perpetrator is a common way that opponents of gun control argue against new gun policies.

In addition to minimizing the importance of gun control policies in preventing gun violence, this simplistic framing of the issue also ignores the essential role of mental health services. When people with severe mental illness are adequately treated, there is no evidence that they are any more violent than the general population. However, the mental health safety net in the United States is increasingly frayed and dysfunctional, incapable of preventing the types of tragedies that happened in Colorado.

It may make a good story to create a super-villain out of a deeply sick and disturbed young man, but villains and superheroes belong in movies, and the preventable causes of this rampage killing are all too real. We have a dismantled and crumbling mental health service system that consistently fails the mentally ill, their families, and the communities they live in. We have easy access to deadly assault weapons, vigorously defended by the companies that sell them. Add together an inadequate mental health safety net and assault rifles at every sporting goods store, and the tragedy of one family -- a son's descent into severe mental illness -- becomes the tragedy of many families.

It happened at Virginia Tech; it happened in Tuscon; it happened in Aurora; and calling it evil, saying that it is outside the bounds of human understanding, does nothing to open up a discussion of how to keep it from happening again.

campaign finance (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) Berkeley (2) george lakoff (1) tobacco industry (2) media (6) beverage industry (2) Aurora (1) social change (1) public health data (1) Texas (1) Gardasil (1) structural racism (1) obesity prevention (1) children's health (3) Let's Move (1) soda (12) government intrusion (1) Nickelodeon (1) vaccines (1) food industry (4) soda warning labels (1) advocacy (3) white house (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) Oglala Sioux (3) personal responsibility (3) media bites (1) Catholic church (1) suicide nets (1) equity (3) prevention (1) race (1) diabetes prevention (1) paula deen (1) sports drinks (1) Penn State (3) racism (1) corporate social responsibility (1) SSBs (1) snap (1) FCC (1) SB 402 (1) Bill Cosby (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) Proposition 47 (1) product safety (1) Coca-Cola (3) water (1) paper tigers (1) liana winett (1) childhood adversity (1) Donald Trump (1) new year's resolutions (1) tobacco tax (1) auto safety (1) sexual violence (2) prison phone calls (1) sandusky (2) media analysis (5) community violence (1) tobacco (5) Merck (1) Chile (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) Rachel Grana (1) childhood trauma (3) Happy Meals (1) Sandy Hook (2) food swamps (1) digital marketing (2) news coverage (1) nanny state (2) San Francisco (3) cancer research (1) communication (2) reproductive justice (1) target marketing (7) youth (1) childhood obesity (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) Connecticut shooting (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) elephant triggers (1) Twitter (1) cap the tap (1) childhood obestiy conference (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) sexual assault (1) suicide barrier (2) inequities (1) Big Tobacco (3) Richmond (5) childhood lead poisoning (1) cigarette advertising (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) indoor smoking ban (1) cancer prevention (1) world water day (1) healthy eating (1) violence prevention (8) El Monte (3) food environment (1) diabetes (1) environmental health (1) Big Soda (2) apha (2) gun violence (1) gatorade bolt game (1) physical activity (1) women's health (2) SB-5 (1) food justice (1) news strategy (1) sugary drinks (10) suicide prevention (2) education (1) language (6) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) genital warts (1) default frame (1) california (1) alcohol (5) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) community safety (1) marketing (1) Telluride (1) food deserts (1) Sam Kass (1) abortion (1) measure N (2) Amanda Fallin (1) food (1) social math (1) news (2) gender (1) emergency contraception (1) collaboration (1) HPV vaccine (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) industry appeals to choice (1) junk food (2) framing (13) choice (1) social justice (1) water security (1) online marketing (1) cervical cancer (1) community health (1) regulation (2) news monitoring (1) Tea Party (1) PepsiCo (1) gun control (2) tobacco control (2) privilege (1) health equity (10) sanitation (1) Measure O (1) naacp (1) summer camps (1) Newtown (1) social media (2) seat belt laws (1) filibuster (1) weight of the nation (1) Dora the Explorer (1) SB 1000 (1) Marion Nestle (1) autism (1) messaging (3) cosmetics (1) values (1) public health policy (2) Joe Paterno (1) public health (65) stigma (1) beauty products (1) media advocacy (20) Citizens United (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) news analysis (2) child sexual abuse (5) Wendy Davis (1) mental health (2) ssb (1) Proposition 29 (1) sexual health (1) junk food marketing (3) obesity (10) institutional accountability (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) Bloomberg (3) McDonald's (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) Michelle Obama (1) prison system (1) Big Food (2) violence (1) chronic disease (2) ACEs (2) built environment (2) soda tax (11) sexism (2) front groups (1) food and beverage marketing (3) soda industry (4) food access (1) food marketing (3) political correctness (1) Whiteclay (4) American Beverage Association (1) Colorado (1) breastfeeding (3) health care (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: