Media oversimplify coverage of Aurora shooting

printer friendlyprinter friendly

In the wake of last week's shooting in Aurora, Colo., the news media have been filled with journalists, elected officials, and others bemoaning the rampage as "senseless" and "evil." On its face, this most recent rampage killing does seem senseless -- until you bring mental illness into the picture.

When people with severe, untreated mental illness are in the grip of paranoia, delusions, hallucinations and psychosis, they can be capable of doing any number of irrational and unreasonable things that are harmful to themselves or others. The likelihood that James Holmes may very well be suffering from severe mental illness, and have lost control of his rational mind, makes the shooting look less like an "evil," "diabolical" act, and a lot more like an incredibly sad tragedy born of an inadequate mental health safety net and easy access to deadly weapons.

When media coverage of these types of rampage killings focuses on the evil and depraved nature of the perpetrator, it precludes meaningful discussion about what can be done to prevent them from happening. Media coverage of Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper's comments is a case in point. Hickenlooper called James Holmes "warped," "twisted," a "creature," and portrayed the shooting as essentially inevitable: Such a "diabolical" person would have found a way to kill people even if weapons were harder to access. As BMSG discovered in past research on coverage of gun violence, this focus on the perpetrator is a common way that opponents of gun control argue against new gun policies.

In addition to minimizing the importance of gun control policies in preventing gun violence, this simplistic framing of the issue also ignores the essential role of mental health services. When people with severe mental illness are adequately treated, there is no evidence that they are any more violent than the general population. However, the mental health safety net in the United States is increasingly frayed and dysfunctional, incapable of preventing the types of tragedies that happened in Colorado.

It may make a good story to create a super-villain out of a deeply sick and disturbed young man, but villains and superheroes belong in movies, and the preventable causes of this rampage killing are all too real. We have a dismantled and crumbling mental health service system that consistently fails the mentally ill, their families, and the communities they live in. We have easy access to deadly assault weapons, vigorously defended by the companies that sell them. Add together an inadequate mental health safety net and assault rifles at every sporting goods store, and the tragedy of one family -- a son's descent into severe mental illness -- becomes the tragedy of many families.

It happened at Virginia Tech; it happened in Tuscon; it happened in Aurora; and calling it evil, saying that it is outside the bounds of human understanding, does nothing to open up a discussion of how to keep it from happening again.


privilege (1) food access (1) Joe Paterno (1) cosmetics (1) sexual health (1) sexism (2) diabetes prevention (1) Sandy Hook (2) violence prevention (8) SB 1000 (1) reproductive justice (1) snap (1) social change (1) language (6) childhood obestiy conference (1) environmental health (1) education (1) sexual assault (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) news monitoring (1) obesity prevention (1) Richmond (5) diabetes (1) food justice (1) alcohol (5) sports drinks (1) Amanda Fallin (1) california (1) Connecticut shooting (1) community organizing (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) vaccines (1) target marketing (9) Rachel Grana (1) childhood obesity (1) cancer prevention (1) women's health (2) cancer research (1) communication (2) default frame (1) new year's resolutions (1) mental health (2) SB 402 (1) election 2016 (1) breastfeeding (3) news coverage (1) nonprofit communications (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) genital warts (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) front groups (1) beauty products (1) Marion Nestle (1) beverage industry (2) autism (1) health equity (10) children's health (3) paula deen (1) indoor smoking ban (1) Nickelodeon (1) FCC (1) Sam Kass (1) inequities (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) seat belt laws (1) race (1) prevention (1) McDonald's (1) Donald Trump (2) social media (2) news analysis (3) nanny state (2) democracy (1) Big Tobacco (3) industry appeals to choice (1) health care (1) sandusky (2) government intrusion (1) public health policy (2) filibuster (1) prison system (1) Newtown (1) soda industry (4) community safety (1) childhood adversity (1) auto safety (1) messaging (3) Dora the Explorer (1) gun control (2) racism (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) tobacco industry (2) suicide barrier (2) framing (14) Aurora (1) Michelle Obama (1) Gardasil (1) sugary drinks (10) Johnson & Johnson (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) strategic communication (1) institutional accountability (1) Black Lives Matter (1) Twitter (1) media analysis (6) Bill Cosby (1) Oglala Sioux (3) food and beverage marketing (3) Berkeley (2) Measure O (1) chronic disease (2) soda (12) Colorado (1) prison phone calls (1) weight of the nation (1) SB-5 (1) water (1) structural racism (1) safety (1) political correctness (1) campaign finance (1) built environment (2) Happy Meals (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) media bites (1) ACEs (2) community violence (1) Citizens United (1) Penn State (3) Big Soda (2) food industry (4) paper tigers (1) healthy eating (1) authentic voices (1) media (7) SSBs (1) abortion (1) Wendy Davis (1) Merck (1) obesity (10) journalism (1) digital marketing (3) sexual violence (2) summer camps (1) media advocacy (23) food swamps (1) childhood trauma (3) food marketing (5) soda tax (11) soda warning labels (1) water security (1) online marketing (1) food environment (1) cap the tap (1) community health (1) public health data (1) ssb (1) choice (1) suicide prevention (2) childhood lead poisoning (1) Whiteclay (4) collaboration (1) community (1) stigma (1) El Monte (3) news strategy (1) Catholic church (1) junk food (2) child sexual abuse (5) PepsiCo (1) food (1) Chile (1) American Beverage Association (1) violence (2) liana winett (1) suicide nets (1) corporate social responsibility (1) cannes lions festival (1) Big Food (2) tobacco tax (1) cigarette advertising (1) HPV vaccine (1) Proposition 29 (1) Texas (1) food deserts (1) marketing (1) product safety (1) gun violence (1) measure N (2) San Francisco (3) white house (1) youth (1) values (1) public health (71) Oakland Unified School District (1) physical activity (1) Bloomberg (3) naacp (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) george lakoff (1) Proposition 47 (1) elephant triggers (1) world water day (1) communication strategy (1) soda taxes (2) sanitation (1) Let's Move (1) Telluride (1) tobacco control (2) Golden Gate Bridge (2) news (2) Coca-Cola (3) advocacy (3) regulation (2) Tea Party (1) equity (3) adverse childhood experiences (3) social justice (2) Twitter for advocacy (1) gatorade bolt game (1) emergency contraception (1) tobacco (5) personal responsibility (3) social math (1) apha (3) cervical cancer (1) junk food marketing (4) gender (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: