Media oversimplify coverage of Aurora shooting

printer friendlyprinter friendly

In the wake of last week's shooting in Aurora, Colo., the news media have been filled with journalists, elected officials, and others bemoaning the rampage as "senseless" and "evil." On its face, this most recent rampage killing does seem senseless -- until you bring mental illness into the picture.

When people with severe, untreated mental illness are in the grip of paranoia, delusions, hallucinations and psychosis, they can be capable of doing any number of irrational and unreasonable things that are harmful to themselves or others. The likelihood that James Holmes may very well be suffering from severe mental illness, and have lost control of his rational mind, makes the shooting look less like an "evil," "diabolical" act, and a lot more like an incredibly sad tragedy born of an inadequate mental health safety net and easy access to deadly weapons.

When media coverage of these types of rampage killings focuses on the evil and depraved nature of the perpetrator, it precludes meaningful discussion about what can be done to prevent them from happening. Media coverage of Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper's comments is a case in point. Hickenlooper called James Holmes "warped," "twisted," a "creature," and portrayed the shooting as essentially inevitable: Such a "diabolical" person would have found a way to kill people even if weapons were harder to access. As BMSG discovered in past research on coverage of gun violence, this focus on the perpetrator is a common way that opponents of gun control argue against new gun policies.

In addition to minimizing the importance of gun control policies in preventing gun violence, this simplistic framing of the issue also ignores the essential role of mental health services. When people with severe mental illness are adequately treated, there is no evidence that they are any more violent than the general population. However, the mental health safety net in the United States is increasingly frayed and dysfunctional, incapable of preventing the types of tragedies that happened in Colorado.

It may make a good story to create a super-villain out of a deeply sick and disturbed young man, but villains and superheroes belong in movies, and the preventable causes of this rampage killing are all too real. We have a dismantled and crumbling mental health service system that consistently fails the mentally ill, their families, and the communities they live in. We have easy access to deadly assault weapons, vigorously defended by the companies that sell them. Add together an inadequate mental health safety net and assault rifles at every sporting goods store, and the tragedy of one family -- a son's descent into severe mental illness -- becomes the tragedy of many families.

It happened at Virginia Tech; it happened in Tuscon; it happened in Aurora; and calling it evil, saying that it is outside the bounds of human understanding, does nothing to open up a discussion of how to keep it from happening again.


community safety (1) stigma (1) structural racism (1) cap the tap (1) news coverage (1) food deserts (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) food justice (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) race (1) food swamps (1) world water day (1) water (1) soda taxes (2) Newtown (1) campaign finance (1) political correctness (1) tobacco tax (1) social justice (2) online marketing (1) community (1) Colorado (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) strategic communication (1) collaboration (1) mental health (2) measure N (2) social change (1) Aurora (1) Nickelodeon (1) breastfeeding (3) Oglala Sioux (3) childhood trauma (3) sexual assault (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) corporate social responsibility (1) El Monte (3) vaccines (1) cigarette advertising (1) genital warts (1) Richmond (5) gun control (2) naacp (1) Amanda Fallin (1) journalism (1) Tea Party (1) diabetes (1) community organizing (1) women's health (2) marketing (1) gun violence (1) PepsiCo (1) language (6) safety (1) Merck (1) prison phone calls (1) racism (1) obesity prevention (1) SB-5 (1) junk food marketing (4) public health data (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) Sam Kass (1) news monitoring (1) Big Food (2) violence prevention (8) beauty products (1) Proposition 47 (1) healthy eating (1) paper tigers (1) Telluride (1) water security (1) new year's resolutions (1) Sandy Hook (2) news (2) American Beverage Association (1) Rachel Grana (1) childhood adversity (1) junk food (2) advocacy (3) public health policy (2) cervical cancer (1) george lakoff (1) values (1) election 2016 (1) paula deen (1) indoor smoking ban (1) public health (71) tobacco (5) chronic disease (2) autism (1) auto safety (1) cannes lions festival (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) Gardasil (1) Black Lives Matter (1) Marion Nestle (1) soda (12) Bloomberg (3) social media (2) SSBs (1) gatorade bolt game (1) sugary drinks (10) soda industry (4) tobacco control (2) communication strategy (1) Proposition 29 (1) food and beverage marketing (3) inequities (1) institutional accountability (1) news analysis (3) suicide nets (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) liana winett (1) news strategy (1) suicide prevention (2) Twitter (1) messaging (3) FCC (1) Chile (1) children's health (3) Catholic church (1) sandusky (2) Wendy Davis (1) education (1) health equity (10) media analysis (6) Big Soda (2) Michelle Obama (1) california (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) media (7) San Francisco (3) sexual violence (2) Joe Paterno (1) Whiteclay (4) Oakland Unified School District (1) sports drinks (1) snap (1) industry appeals to choice (1) government intrusion (1) Coca-Cola (3) target marketing (9) soda tax (11) food marketing (5) sanitation (1) beverage industry (2) front groups (1) HPV vaccine (1) Bill Cosby (1) choice (1) Connecticut shooting (1) diabetes prevention (1) Texas (1) Dora the Explorer (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) child sexual abuse (5) gender (1) abortion (1) media advocacy (23) seat belt laws (1) Happy Meals (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) Citizens United (1) cancer prevention (1) food access (1) food industry (4) SB 402 (1) violence (2) reproductive justice (1) personal responsibility (3) childhood obestiy conference (1) product safety (1) equity (3) ssb (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) communication (2) youth (1) community health (1) Let's Move (1) sexual health (1) prison system (1) Big Tobacco (3) social math (1) Donald Trump (2) regulation (2) community violence (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) food (1) white house (1) summer camps (1) physical activity (1) weight of the nation (1) digital marketing (3) built environment (2) tobacco industry (2) food environment (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) environmental health (1) alcohol (5) media bites (1) nanny state (2) framing (14) democracy (1) ACEs (2) childhood obesity (1) cosmetics (1) health care (1) emergency contraception (1) Berkeley (2) authentic voices (1) cancer research (1) suicide barrier (2) Penn State (3) apha (3) soda warning labels (1) sexism (2) privilege (1) prevention (1) SB 1000 (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) elephant triggers (1) McDonald's (1) Measure O (1) default frame (1) nonprofit communications (1) filibuster (1) obesity (10)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: