Media oversimplify coverage of Aurora shooting

printer friendlyprinter friendly

In the wake of last week's shooting in Aurora, Colo., the news media have been filled with journalists, elected officials, and others bemoaning the rampage as "senseless" and "evil." On its face, this most recent rampage killing does seem senseless -- until you bring mental illness into the picture.

When people with severe, untreated mental illness are in the grip of paranoia, delusions, hallucinations and psychosis, they can be capable of doing any number of irrational and unreasonable things that are harmful to themselves or others. The likelihood that James Holmes may very well be suffering from severe mental illness, and have lost control of his rational mind, makes the shooting look less like an "evil," "diabolical" act, and a lot more like an incredibly sad tragedy born of an inadequate mental health safety net and easy access to deadly weapons.

When media coverage of these types of rampage killings focuses on the evil and depraved nature of the perpetrator, it precludes meaningful discussion about what can be done to prevent them from happening. Media coverage of Colorado Gov. John Hickenlooper's comments is a case in point. Hickenlooper called James Holmes "warped," "twisted," a "creature," and portrayed the shooting as essentially inevitable: Such a "diabolical" person would have found a way to kill people even if weapons were harder to access. As BMSG discovered in past research on coverage of gun violence, this focus on the perpetrator is a common way that opponents of gun control argue against new gun policies.

In addition to minimizing the importance of gun control policies in preventing gun violence, this simplistic framing of the issue also ignores the essential role of mental health services. When people with severe mental illness are adequately treated, there is no evidence that they are any more violent than the general population. However, the mental health safety net in the United States is increasingly frayed and dysfunctional, incapable of preventing the types of tragedies that happened in Colorado.

It may make a good story to create a super-villain out of a deeply sick and disturbed young man, but villains and superheroes belong in movies, and the preventable causes of this rampage killing are all too real. We have a dismantled and crumbling mental health service system that consistently fails the mentally ill, their families, and the communities they live in. We have easy access to deadly assault weapons, vigorously defended by the companies that sell them. Add together an inadequate mental health safety net and assault rifles at every sporting goods store, and the tragedy of one family -- a son's descent into severe mental illness -- becomes the tragedy of many families.

It happened at Virginia Tech; it happened in Tuscon; it happened in Aurora; and calling it evil, saying that it is outside the bounds of human understanding, does nothing to open up a discussion of how to keep it from happening again.


advocacy (3) filibuster (1) community violence (1) community organizing (1) news monitoring (1) social change (1) suicide prevention (2) adverse childhood experiences (3) Gardasil (1) Sam Kass (1) campaign finance (1) SB 402 (1) equity (3) Coca-Cola (3) American Beverage Association (1) health equity (10) community (1) media analysis (5) Aurora (1) institutional accountability (1) Telluride (1) Wendy Davis (1) corporate social responsibility (1) Tea Party (1) democracy (1) food and beverage marketing (3) Measure O (1) women's health (2) sugary drinks (10) Pine Ridge reservation (1) childhood trauma (3) soda (12) Bill Cosby (1) Texas (1) race (1) Sandy Hook (2) cervical cancer (1) Big Soda (2) sexual health (1) prison phone calls (1) junk food marketing to kids (2) seat belt laws (1) Big Food (2) communication strategy (1) Johnson & Johnson (1) Black Lives Matter (1) prison system (1) racism (1) strategic communication (1) child sexual abuse (5) values (1) online marketing (1) news analysis (3) paper tigers (1) built environment (2) mental health (2) food deserts (1) sandusky (2) tobacco (5) Citizens United (1) junk food (2) community health (1) Twitter (1) childhood adversity (1) SB 1000 (1) water security (1) vaccines (1) ACEs (2) childhood obestiy conference (1) sports drinks (1) safety (1) summer camps (1) diabetes prevention (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) gatorade bolt game (1) childhood obesity (1) soda tax (11) cannes lions festival (1) privilege (1) Penn State (3) obesity (10) healthy eating (1) Happy Meals (1) diabetes (1) nonprofit communications (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) Proposition 29 (1) beauty products (1) education (1) food environment (1) soda taxes (2) framing (14) soda warning labels (1) reproductive justice (1) Twitter for advocacy (1) SB-5 (1) apha (2) chronic disease (2) sexual assault (1) tobacco industry (2) Catholic church (1) Big Tobacco (3) Michelle Obama (1) Richmond (5) nanny state (2) suicide barrier (2) alcohol (5) naacp (1) sanitation (1) government intrusion (1) cosmetics (1) world water day (1) Amanda Fallin (1) El Monte (3) autism (1) elephant triggers (1) food industry (4) Donald Trump (2) SSBs (1) HPV vaccine (1) authentic voices (1) abortion (1) measure N (2) snap (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) emergency contraception (1) Berkeley (2) food justice (1) food access (1) Let's Move (1) soda industry (4) media advocacy (23) industry appeals to choice (1) ssb (1) gun control (2) inequities (1) beverage industry (2) public health policy (2) youth (1) auto safety (1) marketing (1) Colorado (1) cancer research (1) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) personal responsibility (3) Proposition 47 (1) obesity prevention (1) gun violence (1) Newtown (1) tobacco tax (1) liana winett (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) food marketing (4) media (7) regulation (2) cap the tap (1) communication (2) front groups (1) Marion Nestle (1) language (6) sexual violence (2) new year's resolutions (1) journalism (1) george lakoff (1) Rachel Grana (1) children's health (3) FCC (1) community safety (1) indoor smoking ban (1) social justice (2) environmental health (1) Bloomberg (3) social media (2) tobacco control (2) water (1) Chile (1) media bites (1) breastfeeding (3) violence (2) election 2016 (1) default frame (1) San Francisco (3) Oakland Unified School District (1) cancer prevention (1) violence prevention (8) collaboration (1) Connecticut shooting (1) stigma (1) Joe Paterno (1) Dora the Explorer (1) health care (1) sexism (2) Nickelodeon (1) target marketing (8) PepsiCo (1) product safety (1) white house (1) food swamps (1) cigarette advertising (1) public health data (1) childhood lead poisoning (1) paula deen (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) digital marketing (2) news strategy (1) california (1) political correctness (1) junk food marketing (4) gender (1) structural racism (1) genital warts (1) Oglala Sioux (3) prevention (1) Merck (1) suicide nets (1) physical activity (1) Whiteclay (4) McDonald's (1) news coverage (1) Golden Gate Bridge (2) choice (1) food (1) social math (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) news (2) public health (69) messaging (3) weight of the nation (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: