Lessons in public health messaging: Q&A with Fernando Quintero

printer friendlyprinter friendly

PreventObesity.net Leader Fernando Quintero is a strategic communications specialist for Berkeley Media Studies Group and often blogs on issues that offer insightful lessons for those managing public health campaigns. Recently, Fernando wrote on how the frame of personal responsibility is damaging to public health campaigns. In short, an exclusive frame of personal responsibility lays the burden of the problem on individuals and their choices, and not on the environment in which they find themselves. But as the public health community seeks policies to change our surroundings so that they support, rather than undermine, health, we need the larger community to view public health issues, such as diet-related illnesses, as environmental and system-based challenges, not just personal shortcomings. Inside Track recently had a chance to ask Fernando some follow-up questions.

IT: What do you see as the biggest risks for allowing public health campaigns to be framed through the personal responsibility lens?

FQ: As I mentioned in my blog, the personal responsibility frame is the default frame. Our task is to show how our surroundings shape and impact health, making the invisible visible. In public health, we are used to producing messages designed to change individual behavior. What we are not used to is developing and supporting messages aimed at making changes to our environment that support health. Without that broader environmental frame, it can be harder for the public and policymakers to understand why solutions beyond behavior change are needed.

IT: In many ways the personal responsibility narrative has become part of the American culture. In what ways is this a barrier to our work?

FQ: When we’re asking for meaningful policy, systems and environmental change to improve community health — whether it involves something like removing sugary drinks from city property or advocating for a red light a dangerous crosswalk — the default personal responsibility frame says: Why don’t people simply make smarter decisions about what they drink, or why can’t parents watch what their kids eat and drink? It asks why people crossing the street aren’t more careful and staying off their cell phones and watching where they’re going. Parents should be watching what their kids eat and everyone should be careful crossing the street, but we also need the government to act when our environments don’t support health and well-being. Parents don’t decide which foods are marketed to kids or whether a stop light goes in — that’s something that, as a community, we decide together through our government.

IT: Can you provide a real-world example of framing and how it affects public perception?

FQ: There are abundant examples all around us. Consider the rise in diabetes and other nutrition-related diseases, especially in communities of color. People looking at this through the default personal responsibility frame are likely to see the issue as one of poor decision-making, lack of willpower and other character flaws. What people often fail to see is how the environment can undermine our efforts to be healthy. Things like a lack of grocery stores and other places to buy healthy food, aggressive marketing that saturates communities with advertising for unhealthy products, pricing strategies that make unhealthy food not only easier to get but also cheaper — all of these are examples of how our environment affects health. But because those things are regular parts of our world, they seem normal and regular, almost natural. That’s how the default frame can impact public perceptions.

IT: What are some of the steps campaign managers can take when they are developing a frame or messaging for a campaign?

FQ: They can reframe the conversation by making visible the many factors outside of a person's control that make us unhealthy. There are several resources available to help with this, including some guides on our website, such as "What Surrounds Us Shapes Us: Making the Case for Environmental Change" and "Making the Case for Prevention: Basic Messages for Health Departments." It is also important to remember that message strategy is part of a larger strategic framework that should be developed first. Click here for more on our "Layers of Strategy."

To read Fernando's full post, "How personal responsibility framing undermines efforts to improve public health," and more of the BSMG blog, visit http://www.bmsg.org/blog.

This post originally appeared in PreventObesity.net's Inside Track.

soda tax (11) food environment (1) media (7) food access (1) water security (1) beauty products (1) structural racism (1) emergency contraception (1) paper tigers (1) health equity (10) strategic communication (1) mental health (2) cap the tap (1) auto safety (1) Catholic church (1) Michelle Obama (1) water (1) food and beverage marketing (3) childhood lead poisoning (1) alcohol (5) Amanda Fallin (1) public health data (1) Proposition 47 (1) news coverage (1) Rachel Grana (1) Proposition 29 (1) sports drinks (1) built environment (2) food deserts (1) children's health (3) Dora the Explorer (1) Pine Ridge reservation (1) junk food (2) childhood obestiy conference (1) Jerry Sandusky (3) food marketing (5) violence prevention (8) Colorado (1) online marketing (1) social change (1) nonprofit communications (1) sexual violence (2) white house (1) seat belt laws (1) Happy Meals (1) tobacco industry (2) Johnson & Johnson (1) HPV vaccine (1) social math (1) Richmond (5) gender (1) sexism (2) Berkeley (2) nanny state (2) beverage industry (2) childhood trauma (3) Golden Gate Bridge (2) social media (2) filibuster (1) SB 402 (1) Donald Trump (2) physical activity (1) prison phone calls (1) Telluride (1) weight of the nation (1) education (1) sugar-sweetened beverages (2) Sam Kass (1) summer camps (1) Campaign for Safe Cosmetics (1) SSBs (1) tobacco control (2) environmental health (1) george lakoff (1) Merck (1) corporate social responsibility (1) ssb (1) autism (1) SB 1000 (1) gatorade bolt game (1) PepsiCo (1) violence (2) target marketing (9) news (2) genital warts (1) food industry (4) Pine Ridge Indian Reservation (2) media advocacy (23) measure N (2) framing (14) health care (1) government intrusion (1) diabetes (1) ACEs (2) equity (3) junk food marketing to kids (2) california (1) Chile (1) language (6) naacp (1) community safety (1) Connecticut shooting (1) reproductive justice (1) healthy eating (1) Let's Move (1) world water day (1) tobacco tax (1) soda warning labels (1) institutional accountability (1) tobacco (5) political correctness (1) San Francisco (3) soda taxes (2) childhood adversity (1) social justice (2) Joe Paterno (1) regulation (2) Texas (1) Oakland Unified School District (1) abortion (1) obesity prevention (1) personal responsibility rhetoric (1) media bites (1) paula deen (1) cervical cancer (1) stigma (1) privilege (1) media analysis (6) Big Tobacco (3) personal responsibility (3) Sandy Hook (2) McDonald's (1) prevention (1) FCC (1) Tea Party (1) collaboration (1) apha (3) women's health (2) childhood obesity (1) sugary drinks (10) Citizens United (1) diabetes prevention (1) election 2016 (1) snap (1) public health (71) Coca-Cola (3) communication (2) sanitation (1) chronic disease (2) Newtown (1) youth (1) liana winett (1) junk food marketing (4) inequities (1) cigarette advertising (1) cancer research (1) sexual health (1) Aurora (1) Twitter (1) campaign finance (1) prison system (1) indoor smoking ban (1) Nickelodeon (1) Measure O (1) news strategy (1) cancer prevention (1) Bloomberg (3) Marion Nestle (1) El Monte (3) industry appeals to choice (1) Whiteclay (4) Oglala Sioux (3) democracy (1) suicide barrier (2) community health (1) community (1) breastfeeding (3) product safety (1) advocacy (3) community violence (1) race (1) vaccines (1) Food Marketing Workgroup (1) public health policy (2) Gardasil (1) community organizing (1) gun control (2) American Beverage Association (1) messaging (3) Twitter for advocacy (1) values (1) soda (12) food justice (1) safety (1) news monitoring (1) food (1) Bill Cosby (1) soda industry (4) Penn State (3) Big Soda (2) elephant triggers (1) obesity (10) news analysis (3) child sexual abuse (5) gun violence (1) communication strategy (1) SB-5 (1) adverse childhood experiences (3) suicide nets (1) front groups (1) food swamps (1) Community Coalition Against Beverage Taxes (1) Black Lives Matter (1) choice (1) digital marketing (3) racism (1) cannes lions festival (1) cosmetics (1) sexual assault (1) sandusky (2) new year's resolutions (1) marketing (1) journalism (1) default frame (1) Wendy Davis (1) suicide prevention (2) Big Food (2) authentic voices (1)
  • Follow Us On Facebook
  • Follow Us On Twitter
  • Join Us On Youtube
  • BMSG RSS Feed

get e-alerts in your inbox: