Video: Testimony of Pamela Mejia: How the news portrays domestic violence
Wednesday, October 15, 2014At an October 14, 2014, hearing of the California Assembly Select Committee on Domestic Violence, BMSG Senior Media Researcher Pamela Mejia speaks about the influence of news coverage on the public's and policymakers' understanding of domestic violence and how to address it. The hearing, "Changing the Culture of Abuse," was held about a month after the media received footage of NFL running back Ray Rice attacking his then-fiancée, Janay Palmer, in an Atlantic City elevator — an act that prompted widespread news coverage and increased calls, including from CBS sportscaster James Brown, for domestic violence awareness and prevention. Mejia's testimony begins at 3:15, following a video of Brown's remarks. A full transcript of her testimony appears below.Testimony
Good afternoon. And I want to thank Assemblymember Gomez and this committee for holding the hearing and giving me an opportunity to speak today. As was mentioned, my name is Pamela Mejia, and I head the research program at the Berkeley Media Studies Group, which is based in Northern California. At BMSG, we study the stories that the news tells — and also the stories that it doesn't tell — about public health and safety. And we do that because the news has a tremendous impact on how the public and policymakers understand public health and safety problems; and the news also shapes their understanding — our understanding — of how to solve those problems. We know that news coverage impacts how the public and policymakers view domestic violence.1,2 In fact, part — not all, but part — of the reason that we are here today is because news outlets received and reported on three and a half minutes of elevator footage from an Atlantic City casino. The statement we just heard from James Brown before the Baltimore Ravens took the field corroborates some patterns that research has consistently documented in the news coverage of violence against women, and domestic violence in particular.- As Kathy said earlier, we know that intimate partner violence happens every day, but it's rarely reported in the news.3, 4
- When it is reported, it's seldom framed or described as domestic violence or intimate partner violence5, 6, 7 — readers and viewers are left to "draw their own conclusions".6 Now, since domestic violence is both a legal and a colloquial term, reporters are understandably somewhat reluctant to use it to characterize a crime before a verdict has been reached. But calling crimes — labeling them as domestic violence serves an important role in helping news readers and viewers understand isolated incidents as part of a greater social problem to be solved, and it also gives them some language and some vocabulary to use to start talking about that problem.8
- The absence of context around domestic violence is especially problematic when news stories include details that humanize or exonerate the perpetrator,9 or that imply that violence is mutual or provoked9 — and we know that that happens more often in news coverage of domestic violence than in any other kind of violence reporting.4 These patterns can subtly shift the blame to victims of intimate partner violence,6, 9 and in so doing reinforce the problematic norms around masculinity and power 10 that James Brown so powerfully denounced in the clip that we just saw.
- When news organizations report on domestic violence, they usually focus on isolated incidents,3, 7, 11 especially those incidents that are extreme the ones that end in murder, the ones that feature a well-known celebrity; 3, 7, 12
- To put it another way, domestic violence as a whole is UNDERREPORTED, but extreme acts are OVERREPORTED.3 In a study that we at Berkeley Media Studies Group did of intimate partner violence news coverage in California papers, we found that domestic violence reporting is more "murder-oriented" than any other kind of violence reporting.4 Now, it's important to report on those extreme acts, but when that's all that happens, the picture of domestic violence that emerges is incomplete and distorted — it ignores, for example, the non-physical aspects of domestic violence,3 the coercive control behaviors that we know are part of that range. We can't expect good, comprehensive public policy around domestic violence to result if it's based on an understanding of the problem that is itself not comprehensive.
- the non-physical components of intimate partner violence,6, 7 the coercive control behaviors, the verbal and emotional abuse;
- it's leaving out the larger context in which domestic violence occurs3, 5, 6;
- it's leaving out the impact of intimate partner violence on survivors, on perpetrators, on their families, on their communities4;